Scientists who occupy a leading position are not required to prove to their colleagues and subordinates the usefulness or futility of their developments. Thus, the EEWS system and its variants were created - analogs that begin their operation after people have already died in the epicenter and the wave of destruction will go further than 50 - 100 km.

This useless toy is financed because of the high position of the "authors".

There are scientists who create unique results, discovering what no one could reveal for hundreds of years, although some were close to solving it.

Discrimination against such scientists provides leaders with income and protection by "reserving a place" for academics who are useless to the country.

in the seventies the canadian province of manitoba conducted a study on basic minimum income - as far as i recall politics intervened, shelving the program even though it had positive conclusions. such as "nobody wants to work if they get the basic min. income"

ontario tried a similar project in 2017, but as soon as the conservative government was elected they shelved it - without analysis of the results.

here are some sites that may be useful to your research. i don't know what studies other countries have done, but i do know that germany is very interested in the topic.

as a matter of fact there is an experiment right now

(https://www.mein-grundeinkommen.de/) which has a lot of research into what people choose to do when they have a basic guaranteed income

https://basicincomemanitoba.ca/?m=

https://basicincome.org/topic/manitoba/

https://www.ontario.ca/page/ontario-basic-income-pilot

https://basicincome.org/news/2017/04/ontario-canada-government-announces-details-guaranteed-minimum-income-pilot/

https://www.obin.ca/

https://en.unesco.org/inclusivepolicylab/analytics/how-ontario-trialed-basic-income