There is no law that regulates human life, such as the law of heaven in which the prophets were sent. It is a law that aims at safeguarding all mankind according to rules based on righteousness, piety, mercy and feeling.

    God created us, and made us peoples and tribes to know and live in accordance with values that respect human, and under controls that ensure everyone's right to live in peace and stability. What the world needs today to study these values and controls and take them until man is dedicated to the performance of his mission, which created for it is the worship of God Almighty and the earth's architecture.

People need to spread the culture of mercy in order to achieve peaceful coexistence, which is one of the goals of spreading love among peoples and nations. This is the philosophy of coexistence because it led man to live in the shadow of great principles including peaceful coexistence among human beings. And make the principles of his life to be merciful to the weak strong all the meaning of these words, and here shows the value of peaceful coexistence between all classes of society, and the fruits of compassion after the extension of the culture of "mercy God be merciful." There is no doubt that if the culture of compassion between the strong and the weak, and between individuals and nations, humanity will witness great stages of psychological and faith building, its results will appear to the nations in the form of harmonious coexistence.

Literacy is a prerequisite for peace because it carries multiple benefits, cutting across the human, cultural, social, political  and  economical  spheres. Literacy  in  basic  education  is  a  condition  for  individuals  to  effectively  participate  in  democratic  processes  to claim a voice in community organizations, gain political knowledge and thereby contribute to shaping the quality of public policies. Literacy  programmes strengthen mutual understanding by enabling people to share ideas and to  express,  preserve  and  develop  their  cultural  identity  and  diversity. Peaceful coexistence and religious  tolerance  imply the capacity to  live together in harmony. The  following  are  tenets  of  peaceful  coexistence  and  Religious  tolerance  that  can  be  included  in  the  titles  of  supplementary  reading  materials  for  Basic Education.

Living in peace, Loving and caring, Caring and sharing,Good neighborhoods ,respect other people‟s religion/beliefs,Equality and mutual benefit,Competition without war,Benefits of dialogue,Tolerance for ethnic diversity,Tolerate one another ,Accommodate individual differences.

When children are constantly and regularly  exposed to good reading  materials  with the above titles, the chances are that they will be more positively disposed towards other members of their class, school and individuals in their communities.

I think that we need to rethink the experiences of reconciliation and the practices of peace of those peoples who have managed to develop political and social consensus, after having passed by bloody interreligious conflict. In the specific case of peace in Colombia has made progress to accommodate diverse visions of the world. That is why I think that the question should rethink in another direction. Not only how to develop the world in peace as if de facto possible pacification learns what you designate with the word world. Accordingly, the first question would be how and how do we agree on what we mean by the world? In any case it is the world in common, if that is the case then there is an urgent need to think in holistic forms that allow transit of a world designed and built by the west and from the logical and conceptualizations westerners to a common world, diverse and heterogeneous in which the conflict has a place and is understood in a positive way. Another problem is the homogeneity of the societies. Everywhere we come to this process of uniformity of identities, equalization of the forms of regret and feel. At the same time, the speeches of the right and left seem to have exchanged completely. In the field of citizenship, there is a phenomenon of indignation growing, of unrest and of indifference and hatred accumulated which operates surreptitiously but that at any time explodes. The processes and logic of govern mentalization have eroded the capacity for political action of the communities. In view of the foregoing, I think that it is necessary to rethink the political action and the demands of local communities that seek to dignify and rebuild their lives after having passed by the experience of the war.

To say that "The main point of confrontation is the ideological shock" is to return to position the problematization at the same point of the "clash of civilizations" proposed by Huntington and I think that thesis has already been refuted both in theory and in practice. In this regard, I am closer to Jacques Rancière, when he says "What we need to fight here is this drift of identity and full of hatred. If the crimes must be treated by the tracking police, hatred should be treated by the political track. To say that we are at war against Islam only manages to mix in the same logic, crime and hate, police repression and political action (and therefore contributes to maintaining the hatred). It is the case of the absurd proposal to remove the French nationality: a measure incapable of preventing crimes, but effective to feed the hatred that begets" (Interview of Amador Fernandez-Savater 10/04/2016). In this sense, it is necessary to rethink the problem so that we can think not only the shock religious/ideological, but what causes and serves as a detonator, the control logic, cast and compartmentalization of the subjectivities.

The deterioration of the global leadership indicates that the geopolitical map of the global is being reconfigured by the emergence of new power blocs and alliances between nations that until a few years ago we did not expect negotiated in the same table. I believe that it is important to ask if the global powers that have the leadership role raised, seriously, the possibility of a lasting peace in the world through dialog and religious tolerance or if, on the contrary, the aim is to manage peace to perpetuate the control in a world frightened and without the energies sufficient to prepend the love to hate, peace to the violence and the action peaceful policy to political inaction savage understood as logic of consumption.

I think we must begin by changing our vital perspective based on the "I-it" by the "I-we", as many authors have already pointed out. Political sociology itself analyzes how this key explains confrontations, wars, inequality, and so on. The fear of the other and the defense of the self. Since you talk about holism, I recommend the work of Ken Wilber in this regard.

I really do appreciate all for your important feedback. We all have certain responsibilities to play an equal role in building a world based on strong pillars of peace and cooperation. Only within cooperation we all can survive. Therefore, there is need to include all elements which are needed to understand one another and to protect the interest of all humanity across the globe without any barriers. Humanity is after all best principle which we all have to uphold and practice for that purpose a moderate thinking and humanistic pattern of life is paramount. And I believe humanity principles are universal gospels and all philosophies include some sort of humanism. Ironically, in practice we find something different approach which actually creates a real mess in the world.  

Je partage la même interrogation que toi. Il faut combattre les idéologie en proposant une autre solution. Il ne suffit pas de les détruire mais surtout de proposer une autre voie. En ce qui me concerne, je soutiens que la civilisation de l'amour seule peut résoudre la situation actuelle. Accepter d'éduquer les citoyens à l'amour, serait la voie que la philosophie doit proposer.

Sports maybe a good choice to achieve this goal. Everyone can join the game, no differents, no sexism and no region discrimination. It does not matter how wealth or how poor you are, sports welcome you to join in. And here provide a chance in communicating and understanding with each other.