Hello Gonzalo Briceño-Mayorga

To turn the LLM into a critical ally instead of a reflection substitute, ensure active dialogue with it by posing open-ended, analytical questions (e.g., "What cultural biases could be affecting the response?") that move it away from being an informer to an igniter of thought. Hold its outputs to great scrutiny: challenge assumptions, elicit opposition, direct questions toward potential biases with a stance that there must be something wrong; never just accept passively. Therefore, in an iterative fashion, you have to reflect on its answers and ask follow-up questions such as "How does this answer contradict all proofs?" to solidify further knowledge and expose gaps. Never mind assuming that the LLM tells truths; by continuously rechecking its answers against reliable sources there will be exposure to real truths behind the veil of possibility. Aiming to refine the capacity to think critically, simulated debates allow the LLM to argue against one's idea or explore counterfactuals. Use series of metacognitive drives (e.g., "What biases can I be under the influence of without knowing?") so as to highlight blind spots and standardize your reasoning methodology. Engage in LLM's collaboration and co-create some frameworks together. Think stands for something more in your concerns in theory, and subsequently, this very meaning reflects the LLM. Every other interaction with LLM should be entered into your diary for another opportunity for your intellectual growth, plus giving a place to honor its limitations-real limitations such as an emphasis on static data, poor reasoning in truth, biases, and much more. And when all the above are completed, lay some ethical or societal problems at its doorstep (e.g., "Who could be marginalized by this solution?"), and never leave alone the process of decision-making to this poor fellow! See him being only an engaging fire to spark passion for inquiry and criticism toward more profound contemplation, wherein persons remain the central point for further analysis, synthesis, and ethical judgment.