I am in need for some inputs from members to formulate the literature review chapter.
I would like to share my idea here what i observed. In generally most of the thesis the review of literature part are arranged according to their objective sequence. Firstly add some articles review which are looks like to motivate or give you your research question or objective and add some more article review which are able to support your methodology that are opted in your work. The articles/reviews are able to support your findings keep them for writing the discussion chapter. Accordingly you may write your whole review of literature part in increasing order according to your objectives. All the best and good luck.
regards,
Sandeep
Thank you . The reason for asking thsi was my work includes two parts that are interrelated. So is it advisable to write Literature review in two parts.
That was my concern.
You are welcome.
I do not think you need to write literature review in two part. Because it looks like very wast and confusing for your research reviewers. The research reviewers only like to see your literature review part whenever they found some unexpected methodology and knowledge gap so be careful in that section during review writing. Use only appropriate literature to support your methodology and objectives.
With best regard,
Sandeep
I know this question is asked years ago.
Please have a look at my blog article that covers the topic in case you land here from a search engine. It contains tons of advice from my experience and the experience of many academics.
Hope this helps.
http://husseinbakri.org/how-to-create-a-literature-review-without-the-fluff-and-nonsense/
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Linguistics
- Composition Studies
- Writing