I utilized a value of 9.51% in the table 4 for the variable in question when conducting the analysis based on the DAPA-HF study. However, discrepancies were observed between the outcomes derived from this specific value and the reported results in the literature. I am seeking clarification on the precise details of the data input process, including any adjustments or considerations made during the incorporation of the 9.51% value into the analysis. Thank you so much!!!

More Weichen Zhang's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions