Methane and carbon dioxide are the main gas fluxes emitted from the soil, and many studies have focused on the relationship between the two. In forest soil, methane is typically manifested as a carbon absorption source, while carbon dioxide is often expressed as a carbon emission source. In our experiment, we conducted dynamic monitoring on a monthly basis through real-time measurements (with Li-7810) using soil respiration collars (PVC) in the field. This was done to investigate the relationship between these two gases, especially under conditions where carbon input changes, such as the removal of litters and roots.
I am considering whether a method involving the conversion of the carbon element proportion in gas molecules between the two can be used, aiming to transform the measured gas concentrations into carbon concentrations. Specifically, for carbon dioxide, we multiply its concentration by 3/11, and for methane, we multiply its concentration by 3/4. Is this method correct?
Hey there Hongfeng Zhu! So, diving into the methane and carbon dioxide relationship in forest soil, your approach to converting gas concentrations into carbon concentrations seems quite interesting. Applying a conversion factor to account for the carbon element proportion in gas molecules is a solid idea.
Multiplying the concentration of carbon dioxide by 3/11 and methane by 3/4 aligns with the molar ratios of carbon to carbon dioxide and methane, respectively. The conversion factors represent the stoichiometry of the reactions involved.
For carbon dioxide:
1 mol of carbon is equivalent to 1 mol of carbon dioxide (molar mass ratio of 12:44). So, multiplying the carbon dioxide concentration by 3/11 is essentially converting it to carbon concentration.
For methane:
1 mol of carbon is equivalent to 3/4 mol of methane (molar mass ratio of 12:16). Again, multiplying the methane concentration by 3/4 is in line with this stoichiometry.
Your method appears sound, but it's always wise to cross-verify with established literature and, if possible, conduct some validation experiments. Different soil conditions and microbial activities can influence these relationships, so having some experimental validation would add weight to your approach.
Some interesting articles are:
Chapter Air Pollution and Climate Change: Relationship Between Air Q...
Patent Development of sustainable environment by utilizing energy e...
Article IMPACT OF SUBSTRATE HETEROGENEITY AND PARTICLE SIZE ON METHA...
Poster Reaction Energy: Fueling tomorrow
Chapter Loss on Ignition: Estimation Method for Organic Matter in Pa...
Article Hussain, A., Dubey, S.K., Shandilya, Kaushik K., Srivastav, ...
Keep up the good work in unraveling the mysteries of forest soil gas dynamics! If you Hongfeng Zhu need any more my insights or if you Hongfeng Zhu want to discuss other mind-boggling topics, feel free to hit me up.
Hello Kaushik Shandilya! Happy New Year! Your response has been incredibly helpful, and I sincerely appreciate it! Moving forward, I will continue to monitor the relationship between carbon dioxide and methane. I plan to strengthen my hypothesis by measuring the physicochemical properties of the soil and microbial indicators. As a non-native English speaker, I am actively working on improving my English to facilitate academic communication with like-minded individuals worldwide. Thank you once again for addressing my questions and offering valuable insights. I look forward to staying in touch and learning more from our exchanges.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Engineering
- Petroleum Engineering
- Gas