I am in the process of writing my systematic review in which I asses the longitudinal association between baseline endothelial function and diabetes type II at follow up in healthy participants. we selected only cohort studies. most of the studies didn't report the analysis between these two measures so we had to ask the authors for multivariate regression and they reported beta, standard error and significance. the analysis they did for endothelial function measure (FMD or RHI) and diabetes status measure (fasting plasma glucose or HbA1c) reported by 3 studies is insignificant as p value was insignificant. only one study reported baseline endothelial function and incidence of diabetes at follow up with significant relative ratio. and it matches with our hypothesis. now I have to conclude and discuss this two different outcome and build my case around it.
i want to ask that what things and factors I should consider in building my discussion. Any help in any direction would be very helpful. I feel like having two different outcomes is the key here but what could I use to differentiate between the two outcomes?
Thank you