I learned that in order to interpret the centrality indices, the CS coefficients resulted from a bootnet test are preferably above 0.5 and above 0.25 is acceptable.
In my network, the CS coefficients for strength is good (0.75), CS coefficients for closeness is acceptable(0.439) but the CS coefficient for betweenness is bad (0.05). I wonder how this huge difference is created and could I still interpret the strength and closeness or does this mean the network isn't stable and I shouldn't interpret the centrality at all?
It is more preferable to interpret only more force measurement because it is the most stable in partial correlation network models
Bringmann, L. F., Elmer, T., Epskamp, S., Krause, R. W., Schoch, D., Wichers, M., . . y Snippe, E. (2019). What do centrality measures measure in psychology networks? Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 128(8), 892–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000446
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Philosophy
- Esthetics
- Interpretation