The arXiv started the endorsement requirement for some highly demanded areas (like physics-hep) some years ago, due to the insistence of lots of cranks wanting to publish their "papers" there. The endorsement works as follows: you must look for someone who is actively uploading papers in the arXiv and has the "Endorser" flag. When you look for a preprint in the arXiv, you will notice at the bottom of the page a link like that:

Which authors of this paper are endorsers?

By clicking on it you will see who can endorse you. Look for some person who knows you or your work, then ask this person to endorse you. If she agrees, then try to submit your paper. You will receive the "need for endorsement" message, asking you to provide the mail of one possible endorser. Then, after you give the name of your endorser, she will receive an email saying:

"XYZ requests your endorsement to submit an article to the ABC section of arXiv. To tell us that you would (or would not) like to endorse this person, please visit the following URL:

https://arxiv.org/auth/endorse?x=somecode"

The endorser will click on the link and will be asked for a code which is available in the mail. That's all, you have been endorsed.

The endorser will be reminded that she is NOT asked to judge the quality of the work, just to make a statement about her confidence in your status as a working scientist. But, of course, the first one that should be convinced about the quality of your work is yourself, because someone will have to raise her hand to support you.

Email someone you know in your area who already puts their preprints on arXiv and ask them to endorse you. I have endorsed a colleague to give them access.

Weird. While I have only uploaded a couple of papers at arXiv, I do not recall there being a system of endorsements when I registered and posted my first manuscript - is this a new thing?

I was asked to endorse a colleague around two years ago.

Is it the same type of endorsements as on this site? When I created my profile at arXiv I do not recall there being any endorsements - but perhaps it's because I was not looking for it. :-) I would say that arXiv is 100 times more serious than RG.

Also: endorsements are like a castle in the sand - it may look good, but it is not sustainable.

My advice: publish your preprint in viXra.

In my view, arXiv is the premier site for preprints.

This is an important question. In addition to the helpful comments already given, there is a bit more to add.

@ Michael Patriksson : While I have only uploaded a couple of papers at arXiv, I do not recall there being a system of endorsements when I registered and posted my first manuscript...

I agree. However, there is an implicit form of endorsement for each arXiv paper, since each paper submitted to arXiv is classified and assigned to moderator for a particular class of papers. The arXiv is very careful in moving a submitted paper from the submission state to the post state in which a submitted paper is assigned an arXiv number and appears as a preprint in the arXiv.

I also agree with @ David A. Towers, who writes that the arXiv is the premier site for preprints.

Just in case for those interested here is the link to the arXiv endorsement policy

https://arxiv.org/help/endorsement

I would like to add that it is not entirely safe to endorse something that has not been proof-read and been through a thorough peer review. :-) But I can certainly understand that one may like a paper, without digging through all the details.

The arXiv started the endorsement requirement for some highly demanded areas (like physics-hep) some years ago, due to the insistence of lots of cranks wanting to publish their "papers" there. The endorsement works as follows: you must look for someone who is actively uploading papers in the arXiv and has the "Endorser" flag. When you look for a preprint in the arXiv, you will notice at the bottom of the page a link like that:

Which authors of this paper are endorsers?

By clicking on it you will see who can endorse you. Look for some person who knows you or your work, then ask this person to endorse you. If she agrees, then try to submit your paper. You will receive the "need for endorsement" message, asking you to provide the mail of one possible endorser. Then, after you give the name of your endorser, she will receive an email saying:

"XYZ requests your endorsement to submit an article to the ABC section of arXiv. To tell us that you would (or would not) like to endorse this person, please visit the following URL:

https://arxiv.org/auth/endorse?x=somecode"

The endorser will click on the link and will be asked for a code which is available in the mail. That's all, you have been endorsed.

The endorser will be reminded that she is NOT asked to judge the quality of the work, just to make a statement about her confidence in your status as a working scientist. But, of course, the first one that should be convinced about the quality of your work is yourself, because someone will have to raise her hand to support you.

I would like to add my experience in this regard. Initially ( in late 90's) there was nothing like endorsement. One could resister and submit their papers in arxiv. I submitted a few of my papers. But due to non submission for long time and change in affiliation, my account was deactivated. Recently I thought of submission again but I required endorsement. This time one of my friends, doing research in the same field did the favour.

This is a new system in Arxiv to stem the flow of bogus preprints. Please note the Arxiv subject classifications and find people in those categories who would agree to endorse your papers by reaching out to them first. For ex: cs.DL, find people who already published under that class and request them to endorse.

I am not in one of those member institutes, and needed an endorser for the first submission. My paper was announced yesterday. It was not easy, but I learned. First, we have to look at the papers announced in a category of our manuscript. Then, we check each possible paper to see if the author(s) is (are) endorser(s) of our field. I emailed 1-2 possible endorser(s) each day (arXiv suggests not to approach too many people at the same time). I got endorsed exactly one day before the expiry day. We need to be persistent and willing to revise our cold calling strategies... I almost gave up. Luckily, it was approved by some moderator too. The whole process took me about one month. Publishing with arXiv the first time is not easy if you are not in a member institute. I am glad that I got the entry ticket now.

I am actually in an engineering institute but I am not getting endorsement. Anyway, very good information. Thank you.

Good luck with your endorser hunting :).

Mohamed Ali Hadj Taieb requests your endorsement to submit an article to the cs.AI section of arXiv. To tell us that you would (or would not) like to endorse this person, please visit the following URL:

https://arxiv.org/auth/endorse?x=QZPHW3

If that URL does not work for you, please visit

http://arxiv.org/auth/endorse.php

and enter the following six-digit alphanumeric string:

Endorsement Code: QZPHW3

@Jayaram as.

Institutional email is required to submit an article without endorsement.

Hope this helps

Hi,

As far as I know, endorsement is automatically done by arXiv volunteers in a few weeks, and is faster in case you have complete Google Scholar profiles etc., and have a good presence in the research community online (an institutional email address as mentioned by Shilpa Mayannavar is also helpful). But either way, it is a process which is automatically done for most people and I have never needed any additional endorsement - just put a good paper on arXiv, use your institutional email address, select the correct categories of submission, and you should be good to go. Hope this helps,

Best Wishes,

Joyjit

You are very blessed, since arXiv announces your preprints automatically. Not sure what do you mean arXiv volunteers (arXiv moderator?). If our institute is not a member or it is the first time we write a manuscript for a classification, we need an endorser. Then a moderator will see if that manuscript fits that classification. Perhaps this rule is uplifted after it merged with Kaggle? I don't know, as I have not checked the rules recently. My arXiV Preprint An experiment exploring the theoretical and methodological c...