Reviewer1 Review Report(round1) (Reconsider after major revision(control missing in some experiments)
Reviewer2 Review Report(round1) (Reconsider after major revision(control missing in some experiments)
Reviewer3 Review Report(round1) (Reconsider after major revision(control missing in some experiments)
Reviewer4 Review Report(round1) (Reconsider after major revision(control missing in some experiments)
Reviewer6 Review Report(round1) (Reconsider after major revision(control missing in some experiments)------------------The above is the conclusion of the preliminary review of an article. The same six reviewers are judging the fate of a PhD. I don't know how he is feeling?
It may be the characteristics and growth experience of a Ph.D.; look at your patience and perseverance in the face of multiple tests and cruel reality. The retreat is the confession of failure, and forward is the hope of rebirth.
Hi Zhou Zhiwu the important thing in these circumstances is to be positive. Some reviewers can be less than polite and helpful, but most try to assist the author and give useful pointers for how to improve their work. Never be afraid to ask for more guidance or explanation from them and work on improving the article. It is difficult when we receive bad reviews, but this is all part of the learning process.
Some reviewers can be less polite and useful, but they are trying to help copy and give useful indicators for how to improve their work. reviewers اhelp their friends during their experiences research.
This problem does exist, with additional references being the most obvious event. However, most reviewers put forward constructive comments, which are worthy of the author's admiration.
Reviewers are not a panacea, but if the conclusions are consistent. That means the article really has a problem - a big problem. Guaranteed to have flash points.