I am not a statistician, so correct me if I am wrong.
I aim to compare the variability of the length for multiple different anatomical reference lines across various locations (the line lengths are different and are not in the same location), but I encounter different solutions.
1- One was calculating the CV for each and using the cvequality package in R, which used these 2 methods:
- the ‘Asymptotic test for the equality of coefficients of variation from k populations’ (Feltz and Miller 1996)
- the ‘Modified signed-likelihood ratio test (SLRT) for equality of CVs’ (Krishnamoorthy and Lee 2014)
2- Or normalize the line length using Min/Max and use the Bartlett/Levene test, followed by pairwise F tests
Which of these approaches is better, considering the goal of variability comparison and not the mean? Also, is there a better way to do it? The end goal is to compare distribution shapes regardless of scale.
Also, a side question is why CV is different for Z-score standardized data vs raw data, if the distribution shape remains the same?