Several indirect approaches such as harnessing drill parameters, acoustic emission parameters, thermal characteristics, mineralogical parameters, and electrical properties of rocks have been extensively explored to predict rock properties.
The correlation between the physico-mechanical properties of rocks and the grinding characteristics in a ball mill is an important aspect in mineral processing and geotechnical engineering. Here are some key points on how these properties are related:
Hardness and Grindability:Hardness: Rocks with higher hardness (measured by Mohs scale or other hardness tests) generally require more energy to grind. This affects the efficiency and wear rate of the grinding media in the ball mill1. Grindability: The Bond Work Index (BWI) is a common measure of grindability. Rocks with a higher BWI are harder to grind and require more energy1.
Density and Specific Gravity:Density: Denser rocks tend to be more resistant to grinding. The specific gravity of the rock influences the grinding efficiency and the capacity of the ball mill2.
Porosity and Permeability:Porosity: Rocks with higher porosity may grind more easily as the presence of pores can lead to weaker structural integrity. However, excessive porosity can also lead to higher wear rates of the grinding media2. Permeability: This property affects the flow of fluids through the rock, which can influence the grinding process, especially in wet grinding scenarios2.
Mineralogical Composition:Mineral Hardness: The presence of hard minerals like quartz can increase the overall hardness and reduce grindability. Conversely, softer minerals like talc can make the rock easier to grind3. Grain Size and Shape: Finer-grained rocks tend to grind more easily than coarse-grained rocks. The shape of the grains can also affect the grinding efficiency3.
Mechanical Properties:Uniaxial Compressive Strength (UCS): Rocks with higher UCS values are generally more resistant to grinding. This property is often used to predict the energy requirements for grinding3. Tensile Strength and Elastic Modulus: These properties influence the fracture behavior of the rock during grinding. Rocks with higher tensile strength and elastic modulus are typically more difficult to grind3.
Understanding these correlations helps in optimizing the grinding process, selecting appropriate grinding media, and improving overall efficiency in mineral processing operations.
All physical-chemical characteristics, excluding rock color, e.g., hardness of the minerals and their texture and structure play a part. The ultimate stage when grinding is executed is paramorphism, simply explained when a minerals changes is X structure without any cheimical change. This might happen frequently with sulfides such as a change in the X lattice of pyrrhotite and wurtzite/sphalerite. Wurtzite which is a common ZnS in Andenian volcanc- and subvolcanic-related base metal deposits is metastable and grinding it for XRD powder diffraction in a mortar already triggers its conversion into sphalerite. I made this unexpected process during my Ph.D. studying wurtzite in Pb-Zn-Cu deposits in SW Tuscany, where wurtzite forms the so-called "blenda fibrosa" (German: Strahlenblende) DILL, H.G. (1979) Die Strahlenblende von Accesa (SW-Toskana, Italien). - Mineralogy and Petrology, 26: 271-278.
The only way out this dilema is a single-X-XRD investigation (Weißenberg Method). More than 90 % of the wurtzite was "paramorphosed" due to my handling it in a porcellain mortar. It leads to misleading interpretations of the physical regime. Please, check-out this phenomenon in those cases where different minerals or different X structure occur with the same chemical composition, especially in the class of sulfides and arsenides