How should ChatGPT technology be improved and how should copyright legal norms be revised so that the continued development of different solutions, generations etc. of artificial intelligence technology and its new applications is not a problem for the development of science, scientific research, describing and publishing research results, etc. just to support the development of science?
The research shows that the development of artificial intelligence technology and its new applications, including the technology of the ChatGPT intelligent language model made available on the Internet, is currently proceeding at a much faster pace in terms of adapting legal norms to the new situation of rapidly developing new applications of this technology. In addition, the developing new applications of the artificial intelligence solutions available to Internet users generate not only positive aspects. For example, there are already numerous situations of disinformation on social media using photos, texts and videos generated by certain artificial intelligence solutions available on the Internet. In addition to this, the possibility of generating the texts of articles and essays using the ChatGPT language model available on the Internet, which does not show data sources, source publications or bibliography footnotes, generates a serious problem of violation of basic copyright issues. In addition, the ChatGPT-generated texts do not contain information indicating whether they are entirely the product of artificial intelligence creativity or whether they are, however, texts produced by 'assembling' them by combining paragraphs and assignments borrowed from other Internet-accessible publications, articles, book texts, etc., which were added to the database used by ChatGPT in 2021 after being downloaded from the Internet. This problem could also apply to the many other artificial intelligence solutions available on the Internet capable of generating images, videos, innovations, patents, computer software, new drugs, technical designs, artistic works, etc. It is therefore also necessary to build a digital labelling system for the various "works" created by artificial intelligence in order to distinguish them from what is directly created by humans. In addition to this, the improvement of such creative artificial intelligence systems should also address the issue of the automatic display of data sources, reference publications, annotated bibliographies and the elimination of the possibility of plagiarism in this way. It is also necessary to adapt the legal norms in the field of copyright law and, for example, also tax law relating to the issue of taxation of work carried out by artificial intelligence replacing humans in certain positions in companies and enterprises. In addition, other issues that require adaptation of legal norms to the current situation of different applications of artificial intelligence are how to solve the issue of authorship and gratification for "works" created by a robot or other machine equipped with an artificial intelligence system, when an intelligent robot has been produced by one company and another company has purchased it, and it is within the latter company that the AI-equipped robot has created certain "works" such as photographs, films, innovations, patents, computer software, new medicines, technical designs, artistic works, etc., which have been created by the robot. In view of the above, it is obvious that the development of artificial intelligence should develop in such a way that it does not get out of hand. This means, for example, that ChatGPT technology should be improved and legal norms regarding copyright should be amended so that the continued development of various solutions, generations, etc. of artificial intelligence technology and its new applications is not a problem for the development of science, scientific research, describing and publishing research results, etc., but only supports the development of science.
In view of the above, I address the following question to the esteemed community of scientists and researchers:
How should ChatGPT technology be improved and how should copyright legal norms be revised so that the continued development of various solutions, generations, etc. of artificial intelligence technology and its new applications is not a problem for the development of science, scientific research, describing and publishing research results, etc. only to support the development of science?
What do you think about this topic?
What is your opinion on this subject?
Please respond,
I invite you all to discuss,
Thank you very much,
Warm regards,
Dariusz Prokopowicz
@all Improving ChatGPT technology could involve implementing a labeling system to distinguish between human and AI-generated content, as well as automatically displaying data sources and reference publications. This could help to eliminate the possibility of plagiarism and increase transparency in the use of AI-generated content.
Regarding copyright legal norms, it may be necessary to revise them to reflect the increasing use of AI in generating content. This could involve determining authorship and gratification for works created by AI-equipped machines, as well as addressing issues related to taxation of work carried out by AI in certain positions in companies and enterprises. It may also be necessary to consider the ownership and licensing of AI-generated content.
Ultimately, the goal should be to strike a balance between encouraging the development of AI technology and its new applications, while also ensuring that it does not negatively impact the development of science, scientific research, and the publication of research results. This will require collaboration between scientists, researchers, and policymakers to develop and implement appropriate legal and ethical frameworks.
Copyright gives you rights once you create an original work.This protection is based on the word 'originality'. Now, originality can be framed by answering what originality in written work is not, which is plagiarism. This is the main topic of the question, that is:
Does ChatGPT creates original work or plagiarizes the content?
ChatGPt's universal approximation claim (which I disagree on the statement) relies on context and creating a permutation group(see [1] for details). The next question in the chain is:
Does the mere segregation of content so that it provides permutations on it not plagiarism? Is an approximator not a plagiarizer?
You already know my answer but I leave it as an exercise for the rest of the readers of this thread
References
[1]Yun, C., Bhojanapalli, S., Rawat, A. S., Reddi, S. J., & Kumar, S. (2019). Are transformers universal approximators of sequence-to-sequence functions?. arXiv preprint arXiv:1912.10077.
The development of artificial intelligence technology is advancing at an incredibly fast pace, and it's important to ensure that its new applications are beneficial and not harmful to society. The concerns about disinformation, copyright issues, and authorship are all valid, and they need to be addressed as the technology evolves. It's essential to strike a balance between promoting innovation and protecting the rights of creators, as well as ensuring that the development of AI technology supports the development of science and benefits society as a whole.
Regarding the question of how to improve ChatGPT technology and revise copyright laws, there is no one-size-fits-all answer as the solutions will vary depending on the specific context and use case of the technology. However, some possible approaches to address the challenges posed by the development of artificial intelligence and its new applications are:
In summary, there is no easy answer to the challenges posed by the development of AI and its new applications. However, by taking a proactive approach to improving AI algorithms and revising legal norms, we can help ensure that the continued development of AI technology supports, rather than hinders, the development of science and scientific research.
These papers are just a small sample of the many research papers available on this topic.
In connection with the above issue, it is necessary to build a system for labeling all kinds of creations, products, works made by artificial intelligence so that every user of certain goods, including publications created by artificial intelligence and available, among others, on the Internet, will know that this thing was created by artificial intelligence. In addition to this, it is necessary to create automated, standardized, reliable, etc. systems that accurately demonstrate the sources, footnotes, authorship of the various parts of a given work, which was created by an artificial intelligence, which in the course of creating a specific work combined various creations of human creativity.
What do you think about this topic?
Please answer,
I invite everyone to join the discussion,
Thank you very much,
Best wishes,
Dariusz Prokopowicz
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Statistics
- Survey