How should a progressive carbon tax be introduced, which should be fairly charged to, among other things, individual economic entities, taking into account the level of carbon intensity?
How should societies be fairly taxed by determining the amount of carbon tax on the CO2 and other greenhouse gas emissions generated, i.e., introduce a progressive carbon tax, which should be fairly charged to communities, citizens, economic entities, corporations, including, above all, fossil fuel extraction companies and energy companies that generate energy from the combustion of fossil fuels, taking into account the level of carbon intensity?
Statistics presenting both the growing scale of income disparity (both internationally, nationally, socially) and on the impact of the scale of consumption on the level of greenhouse gas emissions, the negative impact on the climate, the environment, the state of the biosphere, biodiversity present a tragic picture of the state of the planet that we will leave for future generations of citizens. The top 1 percent of the richest emitted as much CO2 in 2016 as the 6 billion poorer and poorest people. Large, financially rich industrial corporations, especially large companies operating in the sector of extraction and processing of fossil fuels, and energy companies that generate energy based on the combustion of these minerals, through lobbying in the political sphere, receive financial subsidies or other forms of financial support so that they have the greatest opportunity to implement investments that could change the energy industry according to the needs of society. Unfortunately, still most of these investment processes are concerned with maintaining the status quo of dirty combustion energy instead of real involvement of these companies in the processes of green energy transformation, including the development of renewable and emission-free energy sources on a scale that is already possible but is not being undertaken. One of the solutions that could significantly change this state of affairs, which has been in operation for many decades, could be the introduction of a carbon tax specifically introduced for this purpose, i.e. a tax the size of which is correlated with the level of CO2 and greenhouse gas emissions, as well as with the level of investment opportunities of different types of business entities, including large corporations, which usually have the highest such opportunities. On the other hand, the level of income of the richest few, including the owners of the aforementioned large industrial corporations, is linked to the level of greenhouse gas emissivity. In this regard, one of the solutions that can improve the implementation of the green transformation of the economy may be the introduction of a progressive carbon tax (progressive carbon tax), the size of which will be linked to the level of emissivity and income correlated with emissivity. This type of income tax can be directly applied to individual entities, citizens, and in an appropriately adjusted formula to business entities, including the aforementioned large industrial corporations. The funds raised by the state from this tax should be used exclusively for the implementation of projects fully in line with the green transformation of the economy. With regard to economic entities, additional introduction of a system of tax credits for amounts allocated to the implementation of green investments consistent with the implementation of sustainable development goals, pro-environmental, pro-climate, pro-environmental policy objectives, including, first and foremost, taking into account the issue of protecting the climate, biosphere and biodiversity of the planet's natural ecosystems, could be considered.
In view of the above, I address the following question to the esteemed community of scientists and researchers:
How should societies be fairly taxed by determining the amount of carbon tax on the generated emissions of CO2 and other greenhouse gases, i.e., introduce a progressive carbon tax, which should be fairly charged to communities, citizens, economic entities, corporations, including, first and foremost, companies in the fossil fuel extraction sector and energy companies that generate energy from the combustion of fossil fuels, taking into account the level of emissions?
How should a progressive carbon tax be implemented, which should be fairly charged to individual economic entities, among others, taking into account the level of carbon intensity?
And what is your opinion on this topic?
What is your opinion on this issue?
Please answer,
I invite everyone to join the discussion,
Thank you very much,
Best regards,
Dariusz Prokopowicz
The above text is entirely my own work written by me on the basis of my research.
In writing this text I did not use other sources or automatic text generation systems.
Copyright by Dariusz Prokopowicz
Dear friend Dariusz Prokopowicz
Thanks for starting this topic. Let us start rolling this ball.
Now, let's dive into the profound matter of progressive carbon taxation, as I would.
1. **Emissions Correlation:** A progressive carbon tax should be directly linked to the level of emissions. The tax rates could increase with higher emission levels, creating a clear incentive for individuals and entities to reduce their carbon footprint.
2. **Incorporating Carbon Intensity:** Recognizing carbon intensity is crucial. Different industries have varying levels of carbon intensity. The tax structure could consider not only the total emissions but also the intensity per unit of production. This ensures fairness across diverse sectors.
3. **Addressing Income Disparities:** To avoid placing undue burden on lower-income individuals, the tax system should be designed progressively. This means higher-income individuals or entities with higher emissions pay proportionally more.
4. **Investment in Green Initiatives:** Revenue generated from the carbon tax should be dedicated to green projects. This can include funding research in sustainable technologies, promoting green energy, and supporting initiatives aimed at reducing overall emissions.
5. **Tax Credits for Green Investments:** Encouraging green investments through tax credits is a wise approach. Businesses and individuals investing in sustainable practices should be rewarded with tax benefits, fostering a culture of environmental responsibility.
Opinions on this matter can vary widely. Some might argue that such a tax is essential for combating climate change, encouraging innovation, and holding major polluters accountable. Others might express concerns about potential economic impacts, especially for industries heavily reliant on fossil fuels. Striking a balance between environmental sustainability and economic feasibility will likely be a point of contention.
The need for urgent, impactful action on climate change is evident. A progressive carbon tax seems like a pragmatic step, aligning economic incentives with environmental responsibility. It creates a framework where businesses and individuals are not just responsible for their actions but are also incentivized to contribute positively to the environment.
Remember, these are my strong and unrestrained opinions. Real-world implementation, of course, requires careful consideration of various factors, stakeholder involvement, and, importantly, adapting strategies as new information emerges.
What are your thoughts on this matter?
First of all , there is a need to set standard parameters of emission for different class of emitters. For example , A person using a diesel vehicle might be charged higher tax than a person using public city transport ( if there is a proof that enterprise is involved in carbon emission). Even ,policy makers mindset should be mapped in calculating carbon tax. Dariusz Prokopowicz
- Badges
- Science topic