Analysis of guaranteed income as a key element of pro-development, anti-crisis, anti-cyclical socio-economic policy?
Can guaranteed income be an effective instrument for pro-development, anti-crisis, counter-cyclical and, under certain economic conditions, Keynesian socio-economic policy?
What should be the state of state finances, what level of security, indebtedness, possible public debt and budget deficit would be possible to enter guaranteed income into the policy of socio-economic policy?
How should a system of guaranteed income rationing be established in the society in order for this instrument to effectively increase the level of consumption and investment in the economy?
Should a system of income guaranteed rationalization be built so that this instrument of pro-development, anti-crisis, anticyclical socio-economic policy would also meet the long-term goals of counteracting unfavorable changes in the demographic structure of society, i.e. the aging population in a given country?
I have answered these questions in my scientific publications whose links I have posted below.
In view of the above, inviting you to discuss the above issues, I am asking you the following question:
How should a guaranteed income system be built as part of a pro-development socio-economic policy?
Please reply
I invite you to discussion and scientific cooperation
Dear Friends and Colleagues of RG
The issues of specific programs to improve the economic, financial, material and housing situation of households as key instruments of pro-development state intervention and significant components of the socio-economic policy of the state I described in the publications:
Article FAMILY 500 PLUS PROGRAMS AND FLAT PLUS WITH KEY INSTRUMENTS ...
Article Ability to Generate Financial Savings by Households in Poland
Article ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL SITUATION OF HOUSEHOLDS IN POLAND – A...
I invite you to discussion and cooperation.
Best wishes
I recently read about the Finnish social experiment with guaranteed income. It seems that there were ko expected positive results beyond individual improved perception of wellbeing.
I would tie the guarenteed income to the performance of some easy monthly tasks, that are known for supporting happiness, especially meaning in life. Write a thank you letter, write one page about your best experience in life, write what you would like to have your freinds say what kind of life you have lead when you are 70. - People may loose meaning in life when they do not have to perform any task to ean money (peonsion shock). This way they are completely free on what they find valuable, but they are obliged to think about what they find valuable.
Once income is guarented, who is going to be motivated to work for own development??? Maybe only a few who are self-motivated. Then Who are going to lead the development? Think about!
Guaranteed income is a realisation of deep institutional dynamics. Take the Scandinavian countries. Look at their norms and values, and the checks against abuse of societal assistance. These structures were not built overnight. They have evolved. Now take countries at the margin of income, say African countries. They had social structures that supported equity. However, over the past two centuries, those social structures have faced excitations across the world. So, we ask, how will the dynamics evolve? Will the social structures recover their old values of equity (and human civility)? In a way, those are the questions that should drive thoughts on PPP in Africa. Cf. Preprint Public-Private Partnerships (PPP) in Africa: Harking the Holonomic
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Economics