Since in the photogrammetry technique, without direct contact with the object and only by taking several images of it, a three-dimensional model or vertical images can be prepared, it is possible to prevent the destruction or damage of the works during the documentary, which is It is important. Due to the high speed and quality of this method, as well as its low cost compared to other methods such as laser scanners, and on the other hand, low budgets allocated to cultural heritage documentation, it can be a good alternative to methods. Expensive and inaccurate customary.

You can have a look on Virtual Archaeological Review (PO Coder; JL Caro....)

Agreed with Carmen, use Binary logistic regression.

Hi Heather,

I think if you look at the right places, there are actually quite a few research in photogrammetry for museum settings. Right of the bat, here are two in ResearchGate:

Article METHODOLOGY FOR 3D ACQUISITION OF HIGHLY REFLECTIVE GOLDSMIT...

Article Documentation of paintings restoration through photogrammetr...

I'd say that the first article tried to address one of the important issues in museum photogrammetry: how to deal with reflective surfaces. Other than that, the biggest issue in my mind is the technique's requirement for proper setup in the case of very high quality expectations. This includes proper geometric scaling quality, radiometric calibration, image network, etc. Understanding how the technique works is essential and may be quite complicated for first-time users and non-photogrammetrists (again, in view of acquiring high quality results) compared to, say, laser scanners/lidar where you get your 3D model at the press of a button.

We can always get a 3D model out of photogrammetry, but to assure its quality proper knowledge of it is very important. This, in my opinion, may hinder (and have hindered) many heritage actors from employing photogrammetry.

Also +1 to Carmen Aranegui's suggestion to check out the Virtual Archaeological Review.

best,

arnadi

Hi Heather,

can you clarify if by photogrammetry for conservation you mean applications for a) documenting heritage objects for dissemination/virtual display/augmented exhibition, or b) contactless study and/or digital restoration, or c) identifying and mapping decay, previous conservation interventions etc.? because these are usually different categories of documentation in terms of quality and product requirements.

+1 to Arnadi Murtiyoso 's comment

regards,

Efstathios