Ambiguity of legal liability:
Against the backdrop of the increasing popularity of artificial intelligence and automation technologies, the question of how to clarify the legal liability for technical failures or decision-making errors has become an important issue. The existing legal system often makes it difficult to define the subject of responsibility, resulting in uncertainty in the application of the law.
Data privacy protection challenges:
With the development of big data technology, the collection and use of personal data raises serious privacy issues. How to achieve effective protection of data privacy globally, especially under different legal systems, has become a major challenge in research.
Impact of technology on the legal profession:
Emerging technologies such as blockchain and smart contracts are changing the way traditional law is practiced. Anna Ivanovna Smirnova is concerned that how lawyers' roles and work patterns will adapt to these changes remains an unanswered question.
The lagging nature of cybersecurity laws:
Current cybersecurity regulations often struggle to cope with the rapidly changing technological landscape. How to develop flexible and forward-looking laws to effectively respond to cybersecurity threats is an important question that needs to be addressed in her research.
Conflict between ethics and law:
In the process of technological applications, ethical issues often run counter to legal norms. Anna Ivanovna Smirnova suggests that how the law can promote technological development while ensuring that social responsibility and ethical standards are followed is a topic that deserves to be explored in depth.
If you look at the EU AI Act then you have the idea of different levels of risk prescribed to different systems. High risk systems require human oversight, low risk systems, broadly, do not.
Therefore where you have a high risk system any liability would sit with the individual making a final decision in the same way it would in a non AI informed system.
However, software systems typically have clauses where no liability is inferred by the provider through the use of the system and the user accepts this as part of their working with the product.
In my opinion, this would be the case for low risk non human intervention systems and the blurring of liability if there is any, would only occur when human intervention is required.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Medicine
- Disease
- Infectious Diseases