Forthcoming 5G communications shall be depended on millimetric waves, in user equipment and stations, are research and industry (of communications) interested in its effects on Human Health (at least), or they suffice in traditional cautions ? How far you think this topic is important ?
I think that there is no real difference between 4G and 5G technologies in relation to health aspects. The main safety factor is that the radio waves are non-ionizing radiation (http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs193/en/) and the only factor there is the heating of tissue. This does not change for millimeter waves AFAIK, since even for 300 GHz+, its far below the ionizing threshold (which is somewhere above visible light and therefore in the couple hundred THz region and above).
Although Rick's response is technically correct according to current accepted understanding of how non-ionizing GHz radiation affects human tissue, there is a lack of consensus on whether heating is the only effect. A number of high profile projects have looked at these effects. One international effort is the GERoNiMO project:
http://radiation.isglobal.org/index.php/en/project-description
https://www.researchgate.net/project/GERoNiMO-3
I use an EMF blocker on my phone, could you research that as well? I also have an EMF blocker on my home circuitry. What do you think about these?
@Kelly, EMF blocker may not exhibit the required functionality to all radio spectrum emissions around us.
Any suggestions? They sell various different devices with different names, all supposedt to block EMG and radiation. Have you looked at the various items like this online? Some are for healing, etc. some with sacred geometry, etc.
- Badges
- Science topic