Does anybody know of any publications looking at the impacts and outcomes from a portfolio of agricultural reseach projects carried out over a 10 year period in a programme looking at climate change. How can the cost/benefit, spillover benefits, science skill enhancement, international benefits, farmer output benefits, social goods derived from a widely ranging group of projects in this area be evaluated??
Dear Gerald J. Rys,
Please find the information given below and I think it would be fruitful.
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308521X0300132X
https://ag-econ.ncsu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/Evaluating-Impacts-of-Agricultural-Research.pdf
Thanks !!
Dear doctor,
The studies on agricultural research effectiveness were done, by a research team at the University of Minnesota. For example G W. Norton and J. S. Davis ‘Evaluating Research to Agricultural Research: American Agriculture Economic Association 1981. This type of research uses methodological approach taken from macroeconomics adopted to linear dependences. In agriculture, yields are the result of several factors simultaneously. On the brake of the 70s and 80s, I proposed methodology where single factor as fertilization or variety is studied in comparable conditions. This methodology has been approved by Prof. Jerzy Krzymuski an authority in the field of agricultural research and therefore his opinion may be relevant.
"Puławy on January 4, 1982
Dear Doctor
I would like to thank you for the typescript of work and for the wishes. In the materials from the conference "Problems of increasing grain production…. " Prof. S. Starzycki's lecture contained extensive documentation regarding the area yield soil classes and varieties but no further comments on it. I am very interested in this data and I want to use it methodically as an IT data set, which is what I do in the Department. I learned from prof. J. Szyrmer, that you are the person who can give me the most information and in turn from Dr. Zbiedź that your work on this subject is already being printed. Through him, I asked to have a copy. Although the scarcity of information about the collection it is enough for me. I have found a valuable difference in the assessment of the crop yield factor (fertilization) without and in isolation (at least partially) from various factors. this is a key and very controversial issue in assessing the effectiveness of mineral fertilization and the results you get are in line with my analyzes and views. Once again, thank you for the work and if you get disappointed with the institutional science, I offer a closer cooperation. "
Best wishes and best regards. Jerzy Krzymuski "
In the 90s I conducted research (unpublished) on the effectiveness of new variates of cereals. I compared the amount of expenditure for research to yield during the same period. The result was negative, costs were higher than benefits due large and ineffective organization of agriculture science and relatively small scale of adoption of Polish breeds. Such an assessment was sufficient to introduce change in the organization of Ag Research Institute, however, contain methodological error. Presently I would use the data from the production fields and the propensity scoring method PSM for breeds assessment
A few years ago I have returned to the issues searching for an explanation of reasons for growth on various parts of the food system. Please find in manuscript The Food System … posted at RG. I do not exclude that some ideas may be useful to solve the problem of assessing the effectiveness of research.
Best regards
Andrzej Jarzynowski
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Linguistics
- Composition Studies
- Publications