Let's discuss our ideas and suggestions.
I suggest more gamification elements as a leaderboard or other forms of mutual comparison with another researcher with the intention of improving its own profile...
A few recommendations below:
1. Notify members when a follower no longer is following just like when we are notified of a new RG member is following us.
2. Quit asking members to contact deceased co-authors to join RG.
3. RG should not permit any research item to be posted without an abstract. Many times, I am asked to evaluate work based on a title!
4. RG should develop a better mechanism to find citation for RG members.
A few recommendations below:
1. Notify members when a follower no longer is following just like when we are notified of a new RG member is following us.
2. Quit asking members to contact deceased co-authors to join RG.
3. RG should not permit any research item to be posted without an abstract. Many times, I am asked to evaluate work based on a title!
4. RG should develop a better mechanism to find citation for RG members.
Recently, the RG management team made some moves that really affect the site positively. However, there are still areas to improve on and I believe the team will welcome suggestions. Areas such as:
-Reason for a deleted profile
-Notification when "unfollow"
Thanks.
So far I understand, RG is going through a stage of modifications from the end of RG authority.
After completion pf their primary works, further suggestions may be given to them.
Thanks
We can improve it by participating more often, interesting questions, new ideas, and collaboration.
If there is a method to display "reads" on each paper / draft, that would save time instead of scrolling down to each paper and opening it up.
We can improve it
1. By adding in the head of questions
as new interesting questions,
innovative ideas.
2. Uploading of paper is only possible
after abstract is submitted.
3. Quick updates on citations of
papers.
Impressive query........ Well said suggestions by Prof Amir W. Al-Khafaji
For the users, by improving the quality of discussions, and for the website by improving smartphone application quality, to be like that used by computers.
I totally agree with Dr. Amir W. Al-Khafaji's recommendations. In addition, I would like to add that quite recently the RG rolled an update which is quite tiring, at least for me. Previously we could just scroll down and read RG members' answers to certain queries; however, now we need to click repeatedly "show previous responses" to see the responses.
Thank you very much on fruitful discussion.
Thanks to Prof. Amir W. Al-Khafaji and Prof. Nazia Asad , Dr. Abdullah Noori and Dr. Anil Hiwarekar , Michael Issigonis
Very nice question, I agree with the above, and in my opinion it would be nice to have some Android application for mobile phones, which is simple and practicns. Greetings
Maybe it's a little crazy, I propose two scores. A score Pi for (number of Publication, number of citation and number of collaboration) and another score Ai for Activity (the questions, the answers ...etc).
*) I would like to order questions by date. Some of the discussions I get when I search for a specific topic are quite old.
*) I keep on getting suggested papers from researchers that I am not interested in and I cannot remove them.
i think we can improve and support research gate website by encouraging researchers to log in, make account and publishing researches in this platform.
Regards,
Thank you on your valuable discussion Dr @Ismail Younis Al-Hadeedy
RG should not include the number of answers and answer recommendations in the calculation of scores. That should prevent people from attempting to up their scores with useless answers or from scouring the internet for something to say about something they know nothing about.
- Badges
- Science topic