We have recently chosen a flagship species for a protected area in Iran. Before introducing the flagship species to the local people, we want to measure the impact of the introduction on the local people's attitude towards wildlife. What is the best way to do this? Is there a specific questionnaire for measuring this issue, or is there another method that we can use?
To assess local attitudes toward wildlife, you can employ surveys, interviews, or focus groups. Utilize open-ended questions to encourage diverse responses and consider collaborating with local community leaders for insights. Observing interactions and engaging in participatory approaches can also provide valuable perspectives on the community's relationship with wildlife.
By engaging there participation more and more in the activates and awareness of the localities. We also have to benefit them through the services and policies to add there participation and protect the wildlife through them. As they are directly proportional to the wild grounds and can serve them or harm them. It depends upon us that how we utilize them.
Overall, there are two primary strategies within this approach: qualitative and quantitative measurements (also a mixture of them). The choice between them depends, among other variables, on your research questions or objectives, the resources available (both monetary and human), and whether you're in an exploratory phase or have already collected information. In my work, I've primarily utilized quantitative methods to measure support. If you're inclined to follow this path, I recommend the following article
Article Contrasting two methods, attitudinal and monetary, to assess...
- Badges
- Science method
- Similar topics
- Biological Science
- Ecology