I already answered your connected question (https://www.researchgate.net/post/Can_I_make_a_force_sensor_from_an_acclelerometer_sensor), related to inferring force from accelerations.
From my simple point of view, you are looking for a transfer function of the system, that is a non-linear highly complex system. In theory you should apply a KNOW FORCE, possibly an IMPULSE and try to extract the transfer function from that. However, I suggest you to talk to someone that has an expertise in building structures, rather than looking at "sensor expertise".
I think you cannot obtain a reliable transfer function from one sensor only. You can, of course, infer somehow the force, but the quality of the FRF so obtained will be the same as your inference. Knowing the structure (using an existing model) to the point of being able to compute the response when the train goes by (requires sophisticated software) and comparing it with the experimentally measured response is a way of checking the quality of the model and the software, but does not allow you to obtain any model from scratch. Another approach would be to record several travels, but you would need to be quite sure that all the relevant conditions (the train, its load, its speed, etc.) would be the same; then you just change the position of the sensor and would be able to obtain a transmissibility function (not the classical load-response FRF, but still a transfer function).
FRF is the maximal responses of a structure under a harmonic force with various frequencies. So, is it suitable to say there is a FRF of a bridge under a moving train? In my research about high speed railway bridge, different frequency of external force could mean different speed of train. If it is just a train generally passing the bridge with a particular speed, you will never get a FRF of a bridge under moving train.