I already have determined interplane distances and corresponded crystallographic directions for the b-FeSi2. I'm interesting in b-FeSi2 [010] or [001] direction which is in the line with Si [111] one as can be seen on FFT images (b). So, I'll be very grateful for the help with correct writing of the relationship. Current version is: b-FeSi2 [010] or [001] // Si [111]; b-FeSi2 (101) or (110) // Si (111) but I'm not an expert in crystallography and indexing.
Dear Hongwei Liu, thank you very much for irrefragable answer and especially for the observed mistakes in indexing, I realized that spots correspond to the interplane distances and must be written as (hkl). As you requested I attached HRTEM image with scale bar (The nanocrystallite of interest is located in the lower right corner).I would be grateful for the help and cooperation. By the way, do you engage in theoretic method to analyse orientation relationship and сan we agree on a joint research with an article publication in the case of success?
Yours sincerely,
Shevlyagin Alexander,
juniour researcher
Dear Hongwei Liu, I am very grateful to you for really clear answer about what is going on mentioned TEM image. It seems to be Si fragments that are displayed on the image.
Could you please help with analysis for the image I attached this time? The fragment situated in the central area in my opinion has some kind of several flat facets. Also, FFT demonstrate some extra spots that hardly correspond to second-diffraction phenomenon.
Yours sincerely,
Shevlyagin Alexander,
juniour researcher
- Badges
- Science method
- Similar topics
- Methodology
- Crystallography