How can AI enhance the research process across different scientific disciplines, and what are the main limitations researchers face when integrating AI tools?
AI tools are widely used for improving write-ups for research and other documentation and it is effective in saving a lot of time in this regard.
There are other AI tools coming up to help in designing suitable graphics for presentations and papers.
Some specialized tools are being used by measure publishing groups and indexing platforms (such as scopus) to help in finding relevant references and synthesizing the available literature.
All these tools are equally beneficial for all disciplines of research.
The main challenge is the available and access to specialized tools. Most of the popular tools (such as ChatGPT) are not suitable for professional research work.
The AI-driven research revolutionThese models can analyse large datasets, simulate complex phenomena, and generate new hypotheses across a wide array of scientific disciplines. Their ability to accelerate research is expected to touch every aspect of the scientific process, leading to more efficient discoveries.
Can Google's new research assistant AI give scientists 'superpowers'?
Researchers who have been given access to Google's new AI "co-scientist" tool are enthusiastic about its potential, but it isn't yet clear whether it can make truly novel discoveries...
"Another day, another potentially transformative AI research agent. Google’s new co-scientist tool pulls from its Gemini large language models to search academic literature, connect to databases, and even access Google’s AlphaFold system. So what do the scientists who tried it out have to say? Cell biologist Steven O’Reilly tested it to identify methods for treating liver fibrosis, and says, “there is nothing new here”. But microbiologist José Penadés was shocked when the tool proposed the very same hypothesis contained in his unpublished discovery. “I sent an email to Google saying, you have access to my computer. Is that right? Because otherwise I can’t believe what I’m reading here,” he said. (The AI had, however, been fed a paper containing an earlier, related, hypothesis from his group.)"