The need to adapt to and mitigate climate and economic change has led to a sense of urgency in developing policies influencing  housing. But the links between housing, energy use and human wellbeing are complex. This makes policy decisions difficult. Decision-makers need to balance objectives and consider a wide range of outcomes over time.

Houses can have important impacts on our own lives, families and of the population as a whole. A wide range of different effects on wellbeing are possible, including impacts on physical and mental health, culture, social wellbeing and fairness, economic wellbeing and environmental sustainability. Effects can be positive or negative and are also inter-related. For example, reducing drafts in houses can make them warmer and more energy efficient, but may increase the risk of infection and exposure to indoor air pollution.

In altering dwellings to reduce carbon emissions as a single focus and adapt to expected changes in climate, there is tremendous potential for getting things very wrong by ignoring other objectives of housing. It is essential that while tackling the problem of climate change, other problems are not created, for health and wellbeing; the buildings and their contents; and the economic, social and cultural viability of communities.

Similar questions and discussions