Quantum Experiment Breaks Reality By Seeing Two Versions Of Reality Existing At The Same Time - https://www.science-astronomy.com/2022/11/quantum-experiment-breaks-reality-by.html?fbclid=IwAR1Zpa7nnw6gyriHj172xThR389AyDRSv6rG4vjQzt7GJtq81Hk-0SDupT0
The solution to the “Quantum Experiment Breaks Reality . . .” problem may lie with Special Relativity. Regarding the question of length contraction in Special Relativity - Einstein wrote in 1911 that "It doesn't 'really' exist, in so far as it doesn't exist for a co-moving observer; though it 'really' exists, i.e. in such a way that it could be demonstrated in principle by physical means by a non-comoving observer." (Einstein [1911]. "Zum Ehrenfestschen Paradoxon. Eine Bemerkung zu V. Variĉaks Aufsatz". Physikalische Zeitschrift 12: 509–510) Demonstration "in principle by physical means by a non-comoving observer" is the same meaning as "demonstration by experiments performed by scientists not moving at the speed of light".
Now relate the previous paragraph to this quote - “While an observer stationary with respect to an electric charge will see it as a source of electric field only, a second observer moving relative to the first will see the same charge as a source of both electric and magnetic fields in a way dictated by special relativity.” (Penguin Encyclopedia 2006 - edited by David Crystal - 3rd edition, 2006 - ‘electromagnetism’, p. 443) In this way, two worlds may seem to exist simultaneously but that predicament only exists in the frame of reference used “… by experiments performed by scientists not moving at the speed of light". Let’s look at the cosmos from the frame of reference of an observer co-moving with the universe (where observers and objective reality are united/entangled). The weirdness of quantum physics vanishes and no particle can exist in two places, or realities, at once since the unification of everything in space and time - possibly achieved with Quantum Gravity - means only one place or event can ever exist in the universal, co-moving frame of reference).
Let’s add a final note to the universal frame of reference. A hologram’s appearance differs depending on which direction it’s viewed from. If the universe is holographic as proposed by Gerard ‘t Hooft, Leonard Susskind, and AdS/CFT correspondence - if the 3rd dimension is the result of information in the 2nd dimension - a hologram’s property of looking different depending on the direction it’s viewed from might account for two versions of reality seeming to exist at the same time.
The term Holographic Principle is used most often in physics in relation to the way the information contained in black holes can be directly related to a two-dimensional (2D) surface that surrounds the outside perimeter of the black hole. This has no direct connection with the universe being a computer simulation. This article says the 2D surface doesn’t only surround the black hole but is the Mobius strip which composes everything in the universe according to the following details - the real + imaginary numbers of Wick rotation represent the 4th dimension of time and are built into the 2D Mobius strips which are constructed from the 1D binary digits of 1 and 0 (the digits are identified as Hidden Variables compatible with quantum entanglement). Two strips join to create a figure-8 Klein bottle and trillions of strips and bottles respectively form the photon/graviton (the Klein bottles are immersed in the 3rd dimension). Photons and gravitons then interact to create a pressure which can be interpreted as a subatomic particle. This interaction refers back to a paper published by the great physicist Albert Einstein which asks if gravitation plays a role in formation of elementary particles of matter. (A. Einstein, Spielen Gravitationfelder im Aufbau der Elementarteilchen eine Wesentliche Rolle? [Do gravitational fields play an essential role in the structure of elementary particles?], Sitzungsberichte der Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, [Math. Phys.], 349-356, [1919]) His paper doesn’t only include gravitation’s quantum units of gravitons. It speaks of electromagnetism’s photons as involved in particle creation, too. The Mobius strips help form the entire cosmos and they result from electronics’ BITS (BInary digiTS) of 1 and 0 which draw, program, or encode them. Consequently, the universe would be a simulation.
No, special relativity doesn't have anything to do with non-relativistic quantum mechanics, it's remarkable how often this mistake's been made.
And this doesn't have anything to do with holography. Nor is it correct that ``quantum experiment breaks reality''. It's a nice experiment that illustrates entanglement, which expresses the property that a quantum system has a much bigger space of states than its classical limit. Reality is the quantum system, in fact.
The holographic principle is a concept in theoretical physics that suggests all the information contained in a volume of space can be encoded on the boundary of that space. It's often linked with theories of quantum gravity and black hole physics.
Special relativity, on the other hand, is a fundamental theory in physics that describes how space and time are interwoven and how they behave differently for observers moving relative to each other.
Regarding the claim of a "quantum experiment breaks reality," it might refer to experiments exploring quantum entanglement, where particles can become correlated in a way that their properties are interconnected regardless of the distance between them. This phenomenon seems to defy classical notions of causality and locality.
The connection between the holographic principle and special relativity in explaining such phenomena lies in the idea that our understanding of reality might need to incorporate non-local and emergent properties, especially when dealing with extreme conditions such as those found in quantum mechanics or at the event horizon of black holes. These theories provide frameworks for understanding the fundamental nature of reality at both the quantum and cosmic scales. However, it's essential to note that while these theories offer intriguing insights, they are still theoretical and subject to ongoing research and debate.
“…The holographic principle is a concept in theoretical physics that suggests all the information contained in a volume of space can be encoded on the boundary of that space. It's often linked with theories of quantum gravity and black hole physics.….”
- really the claim that some placed in 3D space 3D holographic image can contain “all the information contained in a 3D volume of space can be encoded on the boundary of that [3D] space.” looks as rather, if too, questionable – the real 3D holographic images encode only 2D surfaces of 3D volumes, and map this 2D information onto again other 2D surface, say, a CD disk plane,
- but this image contain fundamentally no information about what is inside the “encoded” 2D surface of 3D volume. Correspondingly the yeah, well existent in mainstream physics, “holographic principle” exists only in again rather, if too, strange mainstream “theories of quantum gravity and black hole physics”.
“Black holes”, though are really extremely exotic objects, in this case/sense by no means differ from any other material 3D objects. More about what are “black holes” see sections 5. “Cosmology” and 6. “Mediation of the fundamental forces in complex systems” in 2-nd link below.
“…Special relativity, …. is a fundamental theory in physics that describes how space and time are interwoven and how they behave differently for observers moving relative to each other...”
- yeah, that is indeed so in mainstream physics, despite that really any real space and time interweaving fundamentally cannot exist, as that rigorously proven in the Shevchenko-Tokarevsky’s Planck scale informational physical model, 3 main papers are
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/354418793_The_Informational_Conception_and_the_Base_of_Physics
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/367397025_The_Informational_Physical_Model_and_Fundamental_Problems_in_Physics
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/369357747_The_informational_model_-Nuclear_Force
- Matter’s spacetime is fundamentally absolute, fundamentally flat, fundamentally continuous, and fundamentally “Cartesian”, (at least) [4+4+1]4D spacetime with metrics (at least) (cτ,X,Y,Z, g,w,e,s,ct),
- and so, when spacetime behaves differently for observers moving relative to each other – as that indeed the SR fundamentally wrongly postulates, this is really only illusions of the SR authors and physicists that frankly believe that this postulate is true.
Really everything in Matter, i.e. material objects/effects/events/processes, exist, having at that fundamentally only real values of their parameters, only in the absolute spacetime, including real values can be measured only in reference frames that are at rest in the absolute 3D space. In any moving frames measured parameters are really illusory – if the observers frankly believe that they measure truly.
That is another thing, that because of that indeed extremely mighty the Galileo-Poincaré relativity principle action in everyday physical practice the reference frames are really practically completely equivalent, and the measured in a frame really illusory values are well applicable at adequate description and analysis of what is observed in Matter.
The post is rather long already, so here
Cheers
[Continuation, see the SS post above] However the relativity principle isn’t omnipotent [as that is postulated in the SR relativity principle], and so that
“…Regarding the claim of a "quantum experiment breaks reality," it might refer to experiments exploring quantum entanglement, where particles can become correlated in a way that their properties are interconnected regardless of the distance between them. This phenomenon seems to defy classical notions of causality and locality. ….”
- if we don’t say about that some observers experiments “break reality”, really, of course, nothing can break any reality, and it is fundamentally unique,
- indeed relates to objectively existent in the mainstream situation, where, say, in quantum entanglement experiments the SR “relativity uncertainty” principle is violated; say, if some experiments with distant entangled QM system is made on Earth, and the distance between the systems is directed along some Earth velocity V in the absolute 3D space, say along the CMB dipole axis,
- then the front QM system’s clock in the reference frame is really “younger” on the Voigt/Lorentz decrement –Vd/c2, d is the distance, than the back system clock,
- and so, if an “entanglement signal”, say, from the back system to the front system, propagates in the space with speed more than seed of light, since in this case the real relativity principle doesn’t act, it is possible to “discover”, including, that the signal appeared in the front system before was initiated in the back system; etc.
That indeed violate manything, first of all the fundamental cause-effect principle, however in the absolute frame the principle is, of course, valid.
So now it looks as is indeed interesting - with what speed the “entanglement signals” propagate? – for what, again, is necessary to have some absolute frame;
- and that can be with a well non-zero probability made, corresponding experiments aimed at measurement of absolute velocity of Sun planet, including Earth, system were proposed yet in 2013-2016, more see https://www.researchgate.net/publication/259463954_Measurement_of_the_absolute_speed_is_possible
- and after the velocity will be measured it will be possible to set on Earth some “absolute frame”, and at “entanglement” experiments at least some lower limit of the entanglement signal propagation speed estimated value can be obtained.
Cheers
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Engineering
- Materials Engineering
- Coating