Hi! I've been wondering on this subject and would like to gain some insight from the community. In the context of marine climate change, namely in Octopuses, what type of reproductive strategy would ultimately be the least susceptible?
A - species which invest in very high progeny numbers and feature a planktonic paralarvae stage (pros: large numbers and potential for current dispersal seems like a huge pro, potentially guaranteeing that the species is able to relocate into more suitable areas; cons: paralarvae are highly sensitive to warming and acidification, and emerge less developed, which could signify large mortalities and potentially impede dispersal).
B - species which invest in lower progeny numbers, hence increasing investment in each individual, featuring direct development into a benthonic hatchling (pros: higher investment means that each individual will be more prepared to face the environment; cons: however if conditions severely condition reproductive investment, a whole progeny can fail quicker than if larger numbers are involved; lack of dispersal prevents relocating into more suitable environments as easily).
I'm personally inclined into option A, but would love to hear back from you. Please correct me if you find anything wrong with my arguments!
Haven't found a good reference on the subject, but if someone knows of one I would be deeply appreciative :)
All the best!