Let me say just a bit:

All explanatory perspectives must conform to the established limitations of working memory (and have conscious and deliberate development occur there, by its increments). Outside of the episodic memory context and other well established contexts/procedures, working memory basically is like short-term memory, limited to 7 + or - 2 "chunks". AND, in an important way: All that has to be done has to be done there; if too much is necessary and is new one can expect some innate guidance, which (in my view) can be as minimal as perceptual biases (conceived broadly and conforming to major necessary patterns 'seen').

Only my developmental psychology theory (ethology) credibly integrates 'innate factors' & 'learning' so BOTH simultaneously have effect (see all my writings available via researchgate.net). The BEST other dev. psyc. theories do is talk about 'learning' involved & talk about 'innate' involved & do so separately, back & forth repeatedly. PLUS: My ethological cognitive-developmental psyc. THEORY (innate/learned) does it with absolutely the most empirical (grounded-in-observable) approach possible. It only recently has become totally possible to verify the hypotheses.

-----------------

Also see: https://www.researchgate.net/post/Have_you_seen_my_papers_yet_seen_the_relevance_of_them (posted in "Theory of representational mechanism" Project)

And, perhaps also see: https://www.researchgate.net/post/What_could_be_the_identifiable-and-definable_components_of_Operational_AI (under "Operational System of Artificial Intelligence" Project)