Has it occurred to any of you AI/AGI people, that if my writings are of a science of truly empirical psychology , even if just an outline with just clear or clear-types needed for such ... !!!!!
... If you make that input central whenever it is (would be) relevant, that would be good material for a Generalized Artificial machine.
Also see my Answer (to this same Question) below for more stimulation of insight ! (Click the Question's title to see it and my answer. )
If you need more of a hint : look at how a small (but central) segment of a voice can allow a computer to produce the voice (even in a MUCH more general way -- i.e. All the words that can be spoken by the computer (after this small input) need not ALL be in the input). The exact same thing can be said about few music samples being enough for the computer to generate much music. Get out of "your box" and be able to think truly creatively !!
Do you [just] want a degree or to make real progress ???? (As far as I can tell 99.99% are in the first category, and this VERY much includes the professors.)
Absolutely, your musings raise a fascinating point! If your writings delve into the realm of empirical psychology, us AI/AGI enthusiasts might ponder: are we decoding neurons or algorithms? 🧠🤖 Keep the insights flowing!
- Badges
- Science method
- Similar topics
- Methodology