Are genuine emerging Journals suffering from being presumed predatory Journals even after proven otherwise? How can we help the former as part of the strategy to defeat the latter?
The research community should not give in to the pressures of "publish or perish" and do due diligence in avoiding predatory journals. After Beall's list was abandoned, here is a new resource to identify such journals:
https://predatoryjournals.com/journals/
The criteria used by this website are
Charging exorbitant rates for publication of articles in conjunction with a lack of peer-review or editorial oversight.
Notifying authors of fees only after acceptance.
Targeting scholars through mass-email spamming in attempts to get them to publish or serve on editorial boards.
Quick acceptance of low-quality papers, including hoax papers.
Listing scholars as members of editorial boards without their permission or not allowing them to resign.
Listing fake scholars as members of editorial boards or authors.
Copying the visual design and language of the marketing materials and websites of legitimate, established journals.
Fraudulent or improper use of ISSNs.
Giving false information about the location of the publishing operation.
Fake, non-existent, or mis-represented impact factors.
1. Meneghini R. Emerging journals. The benefits of and challenges for publishing scientific journals in and by emerging countries. Rep. 2012 Feb 1;13(2):106-8. doi: 10.1038/embor.2011.252.
2. Memon AR. the Term Predatory Open Access Publishing. J Korean Med Sci. 2019 Apr 8;34(13):e99. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2019.34.e99
For me: genuine emerging journals = serious attempts to publish best possible scholarly work from professionals and institutions mostly developing countries not in the main line journals but excluding predatory journals.