Any society that respects the freedom of thinking would be apt for carrying its historical consent, with ability of differentiation, innovation and creativity, and to preserve its potentials by promoting and supporting them, through providing reality with deep interpretations and meanings. It would be able to face problems, solve them, and pursue to achieve renewed constructions that reject ready (Mark Runco 2007, p 12) taboos, complexities and forbidden lines, a society that is made of ability, capacity, potential and skills. The controversy of integrity between (freedom of individuals and power of society), understanding this equation is considered a prerequisite, for a free man is the only one capable of production, accomplishment, thinking, innovation, and the only one who has the ability of exposing and defining defects and corruption,  exercising accountability, to achieve a strong , happy and safe society. A free individual equals a society of progress.  The environment in this kind of a society promotes innovation, interaction and accomplishment.  That's how modern societies were built upon the nonnegotiable concept of the individual's freedom (Rosmary O’kane 1996, p 72) . The result was producing individuals who have no fear from declaring their rights and preserving them. In those civilized communities, the public inquiry protects the constitution, laws, and civil rights.