As AI-based systems are increasingly used in recruitment, appraisal, and employee monitoring, a crucial ethical dilemma arises: Should HR departments be allowed to rely on AI algorithms for hiring or performance evaluation without meaningful human oversight?
To what extent can we trust the algorithm's fairness in the face of human complexity, unconscious bias, and cultural nuance? I'd be interested to hear your thoughts—especially from researchers in HRM, AI ethics, and organizational psychology.
مع تزايد استخدام تقنيات الذكاء الاصطناعي في التوظيف وتقييم الأداء، تبرز إشكالية أخلاقية حقيقية هل ينبغي السماح لإدارات الموارد البشرية بالاعتماد الكامل على الخوارزميات في اتخاذ قرارات بشرية دقيقة دون إشراف بشري مباشر؟ وإلى أي مدى يمكننا الوثوق بـ "عدالة" الخوارزمية أمام تعقيدات النفس البشرية، والتحيّزات اللاواعية، والفروقات الثقافية؟ بانتظار آراء الباحثين المهتمين بإدارة الموارد البشرية، وأخلاقيات الذكاء الاصطناعي، وعلم النفس التنظيمي.
I think we would have to first of all decide (define) whether AI is a moral agent. Then the issue of morality can come in. I think if this is not settled, there will continue to be a blur between the activities of AI and the moral compass of human beings.
The value of AI us its ability to sort through vast amounts of digital data and assess them in terms of its programmed guidelines. Its inherent weakness lies in its programmed guidelines and its inability to move outside them. Thus, AI will always carry the often-unrecognized biases of its programmer(s).
Precious Best, in an April 24th post, asked whether or not AI is a moral agent, and the answer is quite simply that it is not and cannot be. AI can operate only in a binary fashion and morality is non-binary in nature. The extremely rare glimpses into the processes followed by AI make this point exceedingly clear.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Computer Communications (Networks)
- Simulators