01 July 2023 4 9K Report

Hi everyone,

I'm new to qualitative research, and I'm in the process of developing a study on validating an existing measure in a different population. The focus is to explore how participants understand, respond and interpret the items of the measure. I've read similar papers, but some of them do not mention their stance at all, whilst others use an IPA stance. I couldn't find clear guidance on how to help you identify what approach is more suitable for your research. Personally, I have my feet in two camps depending on the subject, which makes it even harder to decide. So basically, the question is, what stance would be more suitable for instrument validation and exploring how the particular group interpret the measure?

Similar questions and discussions