The quantum view is a broad term that encompasses various theories and interpretations of quantum mechanics, which is the branch of physics that describes the behavior of matter and energy at the smallest scales. Quantum mechanics is based on the principles of uncertainty, superposition, entanglement, and measurement.

One of the aspects of quantum mechanics that may be relevant to your question is entanglement, which is a phenomenon where two or more quantum particles or systems share a quantum state and can influence each other even when they are separated by large distances. Entanglement can be used to perform quantum teleportation, which is a process of transferring quantum information from one location to another without sending any physical particles or signals.

There have been some experiments that demonstrate quantum teleportation between remote atomic-ensemble quantum memories, which are devices that can store and retrieve quantum states of light using atoms. These experiments use photons as the communication channel and rely on the creation and detection of entangled pairs of photons that are shared between the sender and the receiver.

However, these experiments are limited by several factors, such as the efficiency of the quantum memories, the coherence time of the stored states, the fidelity of the entanglement generation and detection, and the environmental noise and losses. Therefore, it is not clear whether quantum teleportation can be performed over cosmological distances or whether it can account for the influence of remote masses.

Another aspect of quantum mechanics that may be related to your question is Mach's principle, which is a philosophical idea that states that the inertia of a body is determined by its interaction with all other masses in the universe. Mach's principle was an inspiration for Einstein's general theory of relativity, which describes gravity as a consequence of the curvature of space-time caused by mass-energy.

However, Mach's principle is not a precise or testable statement, and there are different interpretations and formulations of it. Some versions of Mach's principle imply that there should be some observable effects of the rotation or acceleration of distant masses on local inertial frames. However, these effects are expected to be very small and difficult to measure experimentally.

There have been some proposals and attempts to test Mach's principle using various methods, such as measuring the frame-dragging effect around rotating bodies, detecting gravitational waves from distant sources, or observing the anisotropy of inertia in different directions. However, these experiments are also limited by various challenges, such as the accuracy and sensitivity of the instruments, the isolation from other sources of noise and interference, and the interpretation of the results. Therefore, it is not clear whether Mach's principle can be verified or falsified by empirical evidence.

The experiment of James C. Keith in 1963 was a proposal to test Mach's principle by measuring the anisotropy of inertia in different directions. Keith suggested that a gyroscope suspended in a vacuum chamber and spun at a high speed would experience a torque due to the rotation of distant masses in the universe. He predicted that the torque would be maximum when the gyroscope's axis was aligned with the ecliptic plane and minimum when it was perpendicular to it.

Keith's experiment was never performed, but it inspired other attempts to test Mach's principle using similar methods. For example, in 1979, Braginsky et al. reported an upper limit on the anisotropy of inertia using a torsion balance. In 2007, Tajmar et al. claimed to have observed a frame-dragging effect around a rotating superconductor ring, which they interpreted as evidence for Mach's principle. However, their results were not reproduced by other experiments and were criticized for various methodological flaws.

Therefore, the experiment of James C. Keith in 1963 remains a hypothetical and controversial idea that has not been conclusively verified or falsified by empirical evidence.

Lyudmil Antonov: "One of the aspects of quantum mechanics that may be relevant to your question is entanglement."

Thank you very much for your prompt and detailed comments on my above question. In fact, I don't regard entanglement as relevant to my question as it does not deal with any possible influence from distant masses.

"Another aspect of quantum mechanics that may be related to your question is Mach's principle"

That's in fact what I'm trying to point out.

"The experiment of James C. Keith in 1963 was a proposal to test Mach's principle by measuring the anisotropy of inertia in different directions."

I'm not able to read somthing like this from the publications of J.C. Keith. Keith, according to my understanding, on page 11 of his proposal demonstrates that his predicted rotor deceleration results from interaction of highly accelerated point masses with the static gravitational potential of mainly the distant masses of our universe. He simultaneously demonstrates that exactly the same rotational drag results from centrifugal force on the orbiting mass points of a rotating steel ball when forces are transmitted at limited, i.e. luminal speed c. This, in fact, looks like a direct theoretical verification of Mach's principle.

"Keith's experiment was never performed"

In fact, first experimental results were published in 1973 that seem to support the predictions of Keith, see reference below, hence may be looked at as a first experimental verification of Mach's principle.

Article Significant Deviation of Rotational Decay from Theory at a R...

Johan K. Fremerey

Sorry, I didn't know about your paper. Excuse me, if I messed up.

No problem, anyway I am grateful that you even noticed and commented on my question above. It seems strange that the scientific community apparently strives for a common theory of quantum mechanics and cosmology, but at the same time disapproves the ideas of Ernst Mach and J. C. Keith's proposal in view of experimental verification.

Preston Guynn: "The value from the model and the experimentally determined value differ by more than 3 percent"

Thanks for your careful analysis. What do you expect from a first approximation model like this one ?

As to gravity in general related to quanta, a close relationship is suggested from the standpoint of virtual particles:

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/light-from-gravity-warren-frisina%3FtrackingId=mEzEuevWD4V5Kq8Drr962w%253D%253D/?trackingId=mEzEuevWD4V5Kq8Drr962w%3D%3D

Warren Frisina: Unfortunately, I have no access to linkedin.