Leadership is the essence of the administrative process and its heart is a springboard. It is the key to management. The importance of its position and role stems from the fact that it plays a fundamental role that affects all aspects of the administrative process. It makes management more dynamic and effective and serves as a driving tool to achieve its objectives.

Indeed Zainab A Makawi

But what about the fears of followers from telling thier leader about any thing related to the organization if they know that thier leader is very seriousness?

Whenever the administrative, financial and legal rules governing any high-level organization are properly established, they are governed by councils and not by a leader, where the individual's influence and decisions diminish and the transparency of dealing and decision-making increases

Hello, all depends from decisions of top management.

Certainly not only that, but may resort members to falsify the facts for fear of the tyrant leader .. my greetings to you

Following

Generally speaking, my answer to the main question of the discussion thread is affirmative. The problem is enlarged when the kind of leader of the question is uncontrollable. ''Leading by fear is a lot of companies' approach, and a horrible way for people to exist in their lives, when most of your life is spent at work.''

--Richard Branson

Regards

I came across an interesting article entitled ''15 Practices Of Leaders Who Lead By Fear'' by Brian Dodd from which I quote:

• Leaders Who Lead By Fear Look Angry
• Leaders Who Lead By Fear Have Poor Communication Skills
• Leaders Who Lead By Fear Are Insecure
• Leaders Who Lead By Fear Are Lazy
• Leaders Who Lead By Fear Are Not Learners
• Leaders Who Lead By Fear Cause Others To Lose Confidence
• Leaders Who Lead By Fear Go Through A Lot Of Employees, Especially Assistants
• Leaders Who Lead By Fear Ruin Your Nights And Weekends
• Leaders Who Lead By Fear Major On Minor Offenses
• Leaders Who Lead By Fear Are Often In Poor Health
• Leaders Who Lead By Fear Are Mistaken About Loyalty
• Leaders Who Lead By Fear Have Dysfunctional Families
• Leaders Who Lead By Fear Celebrate Alone
• Leaders Who Lead By Fear Are Most Comfortable In Dysfunction
• Leaders Who Lead By Fear Will Soon Become Leaders Who USED To Lead By Fear For more you may visit https://briandoddonleadership.com/2015/08/11/15-practices-of-leaders-who-lead-by-fear/.

Generally leaders have a reason of thought to review & also to take decision in the line of the observation & effect role of member . It is in this line we can generally feel that leaders are born . It is in this line some time back I have my thinking in this line for which I have given my thoughts in my publication under the captioned '' Leaders -A social Magnet '' which I submit herewith for your perusal with a request to offer your opinion

Thanks

Keeping the gates of information flow and feedback open requires great abilities and skills. Being serious does not necessarily mean that the leadership is averse to constructive feedback. What is really important here is that the leader should be receptive of critical feedback to advance the organizational goals. In other words, feedback is very crucial to organizational growth and company leaders should be aware of the value of the feedback they receive because genuine and constructive feedback can enhance the efficiency of the decisions made by a leader tremendously.

Every manager depends on the system, because the system chooses the manager, not the employees or subordinate organizations or citizens. To Jo Miller, "Managers like to control, while leaders inspire trust"

https://beleaderly.com/want-to-be-a-leader-not-a-manager-16-leadership-quotes/?fbclid=IwAR0zlVdgf9hCm-2bj7bW0kJUoL5D-dKurnEfdpkPMgcrGKaEi2WeI8Fs5WU

There is no doubt there is some impact. A serious environment in an organization inhibits members from asking questions for fear of ridicule or retribution. On the other hand an open and jovial atmosphere can foster team cohesion and productivity.

Very interesting contributions dear colleagues

Thanks for sharing your thoughts

If there is trust between subordinates and leader, then feedback always exists, an effective leader can not be without feedback!

There is the saying: "Whoever criticizes us honors us." The good leader needs to be surrounded by people who feel comfortable bringing the bad news.

Following

Let me ask why you choose to put

leader and seriousness togather this ‘intrication’ is the source of all failure

i think that lead is not synonym with to have an organizational power on team

The second concept of feedback which refers to control

so your question becomes which factors affect the canal of transmission and here see blame as a source of entropy H and the shanon METAPHOR Capcity/H is your signal quality maybe ?

Thanks dear colleagues for your valued contributions

Feedback is foundation of democracy. In the authoritarian and corrupt society there is Ipse dixit.

“The foundation and cornerstone of state leadership is power of the people.”

― Wayne Chirisa https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/9099255-the-foundation-and-cornerstone-of-state-leadership-is-power-of?fbclid=IwAR0YIygytvyD-HdgYGN7Zh7KW4BBIlollxg0KjZzhHFTo2nnN6CxTvhTCRg

Yes , the power of workers leads to the power of leadership

I think a serious leader is needed to work in the group; besides he must be dedicated, well-informed of the work and the members of the group, and of course also a good organizer. The leader should not be dictator nor corrupt.

Yes. Always. Serious leaders is required to work for a group.

Yes. I tried it.