Does the gravity of any revolving planet act towards the center of the planet or act as curvature towards the orbit of the planet revolving around its star?
If I understand the question correctly. My answer is no, Normally... But in case of the inercial centre is not in geometrical centre exists other situation. It's just that your question is phrased in such a way that it's not certain that this possibility needs to be discussed... An example of this can be the gravitational field of the Moon...
Newton's law says that an object within the gravitational field of the earth is attracted towards the center of the earth, called the center of gravity, whether it is at rest or in motion. But Einstein's theory of general relativity says that the gravity acts as a curvature.
The Newton gravity theory is a beatiful description to the gravity... But it cannot explain the gravity... I am near ready with the article of graviton:
Research Proposal Physico-metaphysical proof of the existence of graviton (Fiz...
The cneter of Earth does not has atractive effect... In the article Research AZ ELMÉLETI TUDOMÁNY KÉNYES JELENSÉGE
is very simply this situation is refuted... The Einstein's cncept same is refuted there, and same time in the next writting:
Negative Results CRITICAL LETTER ABOUT DECCISSION: 2017.NOBEL PRIZE IN PHYSICS
Einstein said: Gravity is the curvature of the universe, caused by massive bodies. If it is true. the whole water of the ocean can not be stable, as at present.
'Einstein said: Gravity is the curvature of the universe, caused by massive bodies. If it is true. the whole water of the ocean can not be stable, as at present.'-OK
Do you think the American scientists are right? The truth goes against business interests.
'If an object is to escape from Earth's gravity into space, It must move at a velocity of 11.2 km/s or more.' Onto base of actual gravity theory... the gravity pull is maxim on the Earth's surface... and the airplains are able to rise at a much lower speed, The eagels too...
What do you think, does this not contradict your statement, which agrees with the prevailing scientific opinion?
Can you still explain the origin of this: If an object is to escape from Earth's physical inflence zone into space, It must move at a velocity of 11.2 km/s or more ?
How we can imagine the Earth's influence zone in a natural condition?
The Moon falls outside of this zone and yet orbits the Earth. What is the reason of this?
I thought about this for years and finally managed to find an acceptable answer with great difficulty so that my view of the world would not be damaged.
You said: The Moon falls outside of this zone and yet orbits the Earth. What is the reason of this?
The Solar system is the gravitationally bound system of the Sun and their planets that orbit it. Also, the Moon orbiting around the Earth obeys to centrifugal force and centripetal force.
Could you please answer the below queries:
1. How does the aircraft function?
2. what are the truths behind the rocket carrying satellites to the space?
'Also, the Moon orbiting around the Earth obeys to centrifugal force and centripetal force.'- I do not accept this, because no centripetal and centrifugal forces have been detected in the Moon Earth Interplanetary space!
Your first question: I'm not a rocket expert ! I am a geological engineer who was fired from his job back in 1995, after I published my philosophy book... So I don't have to answer this question... Also, what is taught in school often does not correspond to the reality.
Seccond question- is direct connected to the first question.
Third question... The physical space on the Earth's surface is filled with air, and birds cling to it with the help of their wings.- Further explanation is needed, Example here have to consider the weight of birds, the wingspan of birds... there is a plausible explanation for this.
But the fact that the master ship has to be accelerated due to the Earth's gravitational field to velocity of 11.2 km/s to excape in space there is another reason...
You should give a more precise answer to that question:
Why are the asteroids of the inner planets where they are, when, on the basis of their mineralogy, it can be shown that they were formed on the surface of a rock-type planet?
What happened to the centrifugal-centripetal forces, Newton forces, curvature space-time of Einstei that they origianted in a surface of Rocky planet, they are not pushed to Sun, etc?
I have an acquaintance at NASA who admitted that things don't go the way most people there think...
The good answers to your first two question are only known to those involved in rocket design, and they are technological secrets...
And if you don't work at the Indian space center, or other states (ESA, NASA, Japan, Chinese, Iran, North Korea...) center, you can't give a precise answer to your own question either...
You only know the answers given based on the allowed ideas.
The flow is due to the state of the water and physical state of Earth's space entity...
Now can you answer my asteroid question? If you can't, then answer the other question: What causes the Earth's gravitation space to be Danube? Why is there a connection between the Earth's electromagnetic field and the field of gravity? Why is it that a freely falling object does not feel a force? What causes the Earth's gravitation field to be dynamic? Why is there a connection between the Earth's electromagnetic field and the field of gravity? Why is it that a freely falling object does not feel a force, but when on the ground they feel Newron's Force? Why is not correct Einstein's explanation of equivalence principle ((mi=ma) ) in his books?
Does the Moon is a rocky planet? [If not, explain why not; If so, explain why and yet why is it not considered so?]