"ResearchGate is a social networking site for scientists and researchers to share papers, ask and answer questions, and find collaborators. ResearchGate has over 5 million members in 193 countries. It was designed by and specifically for scientists, to meet their diverse needs, and is touted as Facebook for academics. Membership is free but is restricted to working scientists and academics (you need an academic institution email address). The major disciplines represented in ResearchGate are biology, medicine, computer science, physics, and chemistry.
Researchers like using research gate to be found, find others and share their work. This is one place that your work will definitely be found by potential collaborators and researchers that would like to cite your work."
So on my own view yes ResearchGate.net (Social Media) have a legal right to censor to let all rights be preserved.
Thank you for you thoughtful reply and consideration.
I disagree.
To say it is a social network, and then have the network respond by disenfranchising user voices, the liability of this science network cannot be established.
Especially, when you start to consider world treaties and past references leading to war.
No, I say again and again and again. Create RATINGS.
many times the crowd spoke, and many times the crowd was wrong
what is a "computer"?
semantically, a calm P.U. T_E.R.
calm is fairly explanatory, unless you are "EVIL" = LIVE
P = People
U = Universe
T = Time
E = Energy
R = Real
Shared explanation (Assimilation) = shorten the time in the E.R. with "PRO_FIT" = E-RES @all "ROADS" lead to ROME #GEE-ROME ^DOORS *Shutting %Opening (Choices: 2023-2030)
MyWay "SeeManTick" to-of-with-for COM = Christ Own ME == Signal Intel #it's in the AI.RE ^Married Energy *Law Abiding %Disenfranchised ($$$)
maybe we need to talk about the laws formed around the creation of the computer, which was largely deemed a farce to begin with ~ remember
wisdom suffers chiefly when as a result of diminishment
grade ever comment subjectively, in terms of literal interpretations factored subjectively. RG already breaks down subjects, however their literal interpretation remain unscientific IMHO
you threaten to remove me from RG, i threaten to remove myself permanently and then haunt you when MY SPRT rises ~ @@@666