I think that it depends on what is the main issue. If the problem of the manuscript is about a strange and radical (yet innovative) topic/approach, authors need to frequently present their works in various, highly-reputed peer-reviewed journals considering that the Havard Business Review suggests that a pioneer in the field should expose others to that innovative idea or message, naturally and repeatedly, between 15 and 20 times. However, if the problem of the manuscript is about technical issues such as statistical fallacy or wrong/overrated interpretations on the study findings, no matter how frequent you publish your articles, it does never imply to increase the possibility of your follow-up articles' being accepted in the journals. Rather, such a strategy could be dangerous to the scholar's reputation and research integrity in academia. Nonetheless, there is no question that productivity is the most important indicator for a successful scholar, which leads scholars to improve their academic writing skills. I hope that my answer can be of help to you.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Cognitive Science
- Thinking