The built environment is divisive. (Anthony 2001; Haviland et al. 2003; Laurie M. Anderson et al. 2003; Lillie-Blanton M et al. 2000; Weisman 1994). Physically walls divide people on the inside from those on the outside, so at least in a physical way, the concept is self explanatory. And this intrinsic feature of architecture is desirable in most circumstances unless the access is limited on the basis of socially unacceptable criteria such as sex, mobility, race or culture. And there are statutes to prevent the physical environment from causing discrimination for those people who are physically or mentally disabled such as the Australian Disability Discrimination Act. (1992; Goggin and Newell 2004) Discrimination on the basis of cultural or racial difference is also illegal by means of the Racial Discrimination Act (1975) and the Australian Human Rights and Equal Opportunities Act (1986), discrimination on the basis of gender is also unlawful by means of the Sex discrimination Act (1984). Despite all these statutes, discriminatory elements of the built environment still exist (Weisman 1994), and are even written into rigid design codes which form the basis for public health facility designs.

It is incumbent on all facility designers to do our best to design to embrace cultural diversity, especially in hospitals, where there is so much vulnerability. But where guidelines are insufficient, clients often respond if architects can show it's possible: so does anyone have any good case studies? Are there any great examples?

Similar questions and discussions