Correction *big bang is not the beginning of the universe*

Lutkhochon Kuki

There might be an infinite sequence of crunches and bangs in both temporal directions, in which case it's arbritrary whether you regard the origin of any given universe as a crunch or a bang. Or maybe it will all come to an end, with no new beginning.

On the other hand, “Theoretical physicist Nikodem Poplawski has …[proposed] … that perhaps our universe could be located within the interior of a wormhole which itself is part of a black hole that lies within a much larger universe.”

“Because Einstein’s general theory of relativity does not choose a time orientation, if a black hole can form from the gravitational collapse of matter through an event horizon in the future then the reverse process is also possible. Such a process would describe an exploding white hole: matter emerging from an event horizon in the past, like the expanding universe.”

— https://www.universetoday.com/62173/is-our-universe-inside-another-larger-universe/

Exercise for the reader:

اعتقد ان الجيل الجديد سيعتمد على التطور التكنلوجي بكل تفاصيله وبالتالي سيتم استبعاد كل العمل اليدوي طالما ان التقنية ستكون البديل وكل ما كنا نراه في السينما عن الانقلاب الحضاري

ليس توقعا او خيالا فقط

Noor Qais Mohammed

You've misunderstood the question. It's simply asking whether an acceptable alternative to the Big Bang Theory in cosmology can be expected to be developed during the present generation.

Ok. Thanks

Sure I think that will be possible if the new generation developed a new theory about it and a new data analysis appears

“Do you think this generation can witness the brith of new model of the beginning of the universe?”

- to answer on this question it is necessary before to understand – what is “universe”? what is possible, though in rather common sense, only in framework of the Shevchenko-Tokarevsky’s “The Information as Absolute” conception https://www.researchgate.net/publication/260930711_the_Information_as_Absolute DOI 10.5281/zenodo.268904,

- where it is rigorously proven that there exist nothing besides some informational patterns/systems that are elements of the absolutely fundamental and absolutely infinite “Information” Set. Including the tribal “universe” is absolutely for sure is only some informational system, which is placed somewhere in the Set.

Further it turns out to be possible to put forward quite rational hypothesis, that “universe”, more correctly in this case “Matter”, as that follows from all experimental data, is rather simple system, which is based on a simple binary reversible logics, i.e. it is some “automaton” that constantly runs basing on “hardware” – the binary reversible fundamental logical elements [5]4D [FLE], which compose the dense [5]4D FLE-lattice, which is placed in the corresponding the Matter’s fundamentally absolute, fundamentally flat, and fundamentally Euclidian, [5]4D spacetime with metrics (cτ,X,Y,Z,ct), and everything in Matter is/are some disturbances in the lattice;

- however this simple binary system is organized so nicely and smartly, that it looks as that Matter was created by other the Set’s element – the informational system “Matter’s smart Creator”.

From these common suggestions the unique now rational model of the creation follows – see https://www.researchgate.net/publication/355361749_The_informational_physical_model_and_fundamental_problems_in_physics , doi: 10.20944/preprints202110.0453.v1, section “Cosmology”, which with a rather non-zero probability yet during the present generation clarifies many of cosmological problems in this case, including practically for sure solves the “matter-antimatter asymmetry” problem; etc.

Cheers