Results of the mutual evaluation reports on anti- money laundering and countering the financing terrorism (AML/CFT) cause many consequences for jurisdictions where their AML/CFT regime is weak. In some instances, results are questionable in terms of the risk, context, and level of income of countries. In this context, do you think that the evaluation methodology treats equally for all jurisdictions?
- Badges
- Science method
- Similar topics
- Methodology
Similar questions and discussions