you should used all available indicators, RG score one of them

Yes i think the RG score is an indicator of good scientific work .

Not necessarily

I think RG is a good plateform for learning, discussing and sharing research. But as an indicater for scientific contribution, RG score has no value. Instead in my view, Google Scholar H-index and H-10 index better describes the scientific reputation of scholars.

Not at all. RG score don't have any scientific base and not approved by any authority. There are so many researchers and scientists they do not use RG. But it does not mean that they are not performing the science. RG score is not counted directly for researcher's career. Not counted for promotion. Even, it has no meaning for individuals those are not the members of RG.

its a good platform for new researcher

Well thats not True at all. Some Scientists join RG platform with 50 published Research publications with 20 years experience and their RG score comes as 1.9 so its very low. RG is a platform who scores individuals with in their platform activity not outside daily research activities. Regards

Not necessarily

I think RG is not indicator of our scientific work.

you should used all available indicators, RG score one of them

Nope

Not necessarily

Not necessarily

Thanx to all of you.

Not it depends on your activity in RG.

(@Rana) I agree with you.

Not necessarily

Not necessarily