Unfortunately, in the time period we live in, people's devotion to religion decreases. I think that the advancement, facilitation and cheapening of technology, communication and transportation affect this. There is no place on earth where religion is felt strongly and does not spread to other areas. It is very tempting to try to transform the dominant religion into culture, to make money through it, and finally to seize the power of the state and determine a permanent policy. However, there are many drawbacks to making religion the center of physical life. First of all, different fields have different rules. The values ​​and rules of politics, economy and culture are very different. Directing them on the axis of religion will not be effective and will have an exclusive effect on a segment of the population. For example, in the context of India, the pursuit of such a policy for Muslims would be exclusive and would ultimately not achieve the intended purpose.

In a society, everyone do not have the same capacity and aptitude to absorb a very high level of religious teachings. Those who can absorb these teachings and follow them in their lives are very few like monks and brahmacharis. This is a full time job. If everyone goes for this kind of a life then the society will get destroyed. This is why within Hinduism there are certain diluted forms of religions that people with different capacities and taste can follow and benefit. In Hinduism spiritual development takes place over several cycles of birth and death. So no one is excluded from the ultimate reward that the religion has to offer.

Hinduism is a philosophy. It cannot deviate itself of its own. The user deviates it intentionally to fulfill his/her interest. Fire can light a lamp. Also it can be used to destroy the house of the opponent. Fire is not responsible. Its user is solely responsible. They say science is a good slave but a bad master.