In my opinion, this is not a matter of faith. Telepathy is already scientifically explained. Unfortunately, knowledge in this field is still incomplete and unordered. Driving research is difficult. On the other hand, there is already a lot of data, recorded cases of telepathy, precisely described situations in which examples of telepathy have been recorded, that it is no longer pseudoscience only documented knowledge about specific facts. It is necessary to continue research in this field. It should be examined whether the occurrence of telepathy is influenced to the greatest extent by people's personal characteristics, predispositions or rather the factors responsible for the existence of telepathy are various external factors occurring in the environment of people who are telepaths.
In my opinion, this is not a matter of faith. Telepathy is already scientifically explained. Unfortunately, knowledge in this field is still incomplete and unordered. Driving research is difficult. On the other hand, there is already a lot of data, recorded cases of telepathy, precisely described situations in which examples of telepathy have been recorded, that it is no longer pseudoscience only documented knowledge about specific facts. It is necessary to continue research in this field. It should be examined whether the occurrence of telepathy is influenced to the greatest extent by people's personal characteristics, predispositions or rather the factors responsible for the existence of telepathy are various external factors occurring in the environment of people who are telepaths.
There have been deja vu situations when one person senses that someone else (the second person) is thinking about the first person or something bad is happening to the second person. When there have been no rational explanations, the effect is attributed to something as explainable which may be called by some people as telepathy.