Just curious if the reviews that the authors see are exactly the same as what the reviewer actually writes. For example, can the editor delete certain points if they don't seem to be relevant?
Editors may review and edit reviews for various reasons such as to ensure the quality and relevance of the content, to avoid potential conflict or bias, and to ensure that the feedback is constructive and helpful to the authors. It is also possible that editors may delete certain points that they deem irrelevant or inappropriate. Ultimately, the review process may vary depending on the specific journal, editor, and review process. It is important for authors to carefully review the feedback they receive and ask for clarification if necessary.
Hello Tomas Chlubna
The editors in some journals do this, as you say. That is what I noticed. Some journals do not have editors do this.
So it is very different in different journals.
- Badges
- Science topic