Why is there so little legal scientific output from distinguished private law professors who write about all that is thorny and seek innovation and to magnify their current efforts, so much so that some of them limit their writings to methodological books for preliminary studies and explaining legal texts and comparing them with other legislation and religious jurisprudence?
After that, it became clear to me that writing on topics characterized by innovation
It takes a very long time to deviate from the classical tradition in terms of maturing the idea, determining its scope, and putting it in its correct place. Even more than that, the idea of some topics does not fully mature except after extensive reading, study, and study, and these ideas are usually indirect and not focused on the same topic. It contradicts what is established by jurisprudence and law.