To Everyone out there - thank you for your comments in advance. I welcome all comments and suggestions.
I am involved in a project studying country/region level catastrophe response systems.
To be clear, I need to clarify my use of the term catastrophe.
Insurance companies define disaster and catastrophe differently. There are 2 main contextual differences.
Disasters are predicable and local.
Catastrophes are widespread (regions, country wide) and not predictable.
Disaster Example: Tornadoes in Oklahoma
Catastrophe Example: The 2004 Indian Ocean Tsunami
Our research is trying to codify differences in the context of (for example) widespread floods, fires, hurricanes, cyclones, wind events, chemical spills, earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, etc. impacting a large geographic area.
Catastrophe Response:
Here is our Main Area of Inquiry (let's call this Q1):
In your country, when there is a large scale catastrophe, what international, country or regional Institutions are in control and what is the scope of their control (to what level are they responsible for the response)? Please clarify if they are governmental or public/private organizations. Also, are they local, regional or national? What does it take to elevate a regional catastrophe to receive country level (national) response? To what degree is the response elevated to international response?
Here is our Secondary Area of Inquiry (let's call this Q2):
To what degree are independent, non-governmental or local response organizations involved? (UN, Red Cross, local NGOs). If they are involved, how responsible are they (in a percentage compared to a government agency or military role)? In a catastrophe, to what extent (% response) is left up to local businesses, regional governments, local citizens?
We welcome ALL answers, comments and questions.
Thank you.
MT