Researchers understand the problem of the digital brain in different ways. By the way, the definition of "digital brain" is incorrect. First of all, it is expedient to define the concept "digital brain". Then there will be few speculative articles on this topic. Please see two articles that address specific issues of neuro-feedback and the expansion of brain capacity in patients with dementia.
Two thousand, five hundred years ago, Aesop taught us that the slow and steady tortoise always wins the race. Somewhere along the road to our always-on society, the tables turned and the hare has become the hero. Take pitching. We feel we have no time, so we go straight to the fastest tool we have – the internet – and straight into hare mode.
What would happen if we were forced to turn the tables and work at a slower tortoise pace? What if we took two planners and one was allowed to use the internet to answer a brief and the other wasn’t? Is the internet really the planner’s speedy friend or is the real world a slower and more revealing place?
To test our theory, we needed a topic to study. The challenge, set by Nick Daniel at Dogs Trust, was "What does a dog mean to their owner?" and could be tackled in both real and digital worlds.
Now we needed two planners. Step forward Adina and Jacob. One would use only the internet to find a consumer insight. They couldn’t read any physical books or newspaper articles, just the internet. The other was not allowed to use the internet. They couldn’t e-mail anyone about the project or conduct online research. They had just four days to complete the task. Caroline Deput, strategy partner, Kitcatt Nohr
Read more at https://www.campaignlive.co.uk/article/digital-brain-vs-analogue-mind-internet-help-hinder-planning/1359704#Wm8F8v1Hg887jUc4.99