ABSTRACT : This study aims to debate and analyze the implementation of artificial intelligence (AI) in the Justice Age of the Future Democracy and how it can affect civil and criminal investigation. To do so, a database of indexed scientific papers and conference materials were "searched" to gather their findings. Artificial intelligence (AI), is a science for the development of intelligent machines and has its roots in the early philosophical studies of human nature and in the process of knowing the world, expanded by neurophysiologists and psychologists in the form of a series of theories, about the work of the human brain and thought. The stage of the development of the science of artificial intelligence is the development of the foundation of the mathematical theory of computation - the theory of algorithms - and the creation of computers, Anglin, (1995). "Artificial Intelligence" is a science that has theoretical and experimental parts. In practice, the problem of the creation of "Artificial Intelligence" is, on the one hand, at the intersection of computer technology and, on the other, with neurophysiology, cognitive and behavioral psychology. The Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence serves as a theoretical basis, but only with the appearance of significant results will the theory acquire an independent meaning. Until now, the theory and practice of "Artificial Intelligence" must be distinguished from the mathematical, algorithmic, robotic, physiological, and other theoretical techniques and experimental techniques that have an independent meaning. KEYWORDS: Artificial Intelligence; Hybrid Smart Systems (HIS); Computer Machines; Robotics; Test of Turing.
It is a very interesting study. the methods of implementing theoretical capacities in practice are interesting!
Jose Poças Rascão
Dear Professor,
Thank you for the interesting topic of discussion.
These days I hear a lot about AI. The problem is that the AI is costly for most parts of the world. So, AI will create divisions among richer and poorer nations. Thus, in reality it is going to create more problems for the world, than it will solve.
Best regards,
Anamitra.
Globalization is a reality.
The implementation of this model is based on the Universality of Human Rights defined by the UN.
We will have equal penalties in any country in the world for the same type of crime.
We have the guarantee that there is no human subjectivity of the judge (s) in determining the penalty. We have a significant cost reduction with justice and deadlines.
Congrats, Jose Poças Rascão , have recommended your comprehensive article, with respect to future legal issues. In terms of legal processes, the impact of AI and automatized decision-making will be disruptive for the whole legal profession; the real consequences of this exponential knowledge automation are very difficult to foresee, i.e. not sure at all that a wise use of new things (tools) will happen, e.g. autocracies and dictatorships are using already all kinds of legal automation processes to control their citizens and territory. Economically, democracies have lost a vital part of their efficiency, which has also been observed by leading newspapers.
Method Review of Globalization and Autocracy article
Dear Stephen,
Thanks for your precious words.
Globalization and technological evolution is a reality.
I am aware that this model will bring about a peaceful revolution in world society in practical terms, as well as the implementation of the Democracy of the Future. But that it represents a great benefit for world society, I have no doubts.
The use of artificial intelligence (AI) in the justice system is a topic of ongoing debate, particularly in the context of democratic principles and the digital society. On the one hand, AI has the potential to improve the efficiency, accuracy, and fairness of the justice system by automating routine tasks, analyzing large amounts of data, and identifying patterns and biases. This could lead to more objective and consistent decision-making, and reduce the risk of errors and discrimination.
On the other hand, there are concerns about the potential risks and challenges associated with the use of AI in the justice system. One concern is the lack of transparency and accountability in AI decision-making processes, which can make it difficult for individuals to understand how decisions are made and challenge them if necessary. Another concern is the potential for AI systems to reinforce existing biases and discrimination, particularly if they are trained on biased or incomplete data.
To address these concerns, it is important to ensure that AI systems are developed and implemented in a transparent and accountable manner, with appropriate safeguards to protect individuals' rights and freedoms. This may involve developing ethical frameworks for AI in the justice system, ensuring that AI systems are subject to independent oversight and review, and providing avenues for individuals to challenge AI decisions if necessary.
Ultimately, the use of AI in the justice system should be guided by democratic principles and a commitment to fairness, equity, and justice. This requires ongoing debate and dialogue between stakeholders, including legal experts, policymakers, technologists, and members of the public, to ensure that AI is developed and used in ways that are consistent with democratic values and the needs of the digital society.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Names