Such countries certainly do have informal markets that operate along side the more normal ones: fake goods, fake alcohol, cigarettes and other tobacco, fake fashion items etc etc etc....Often sold by petty criminals in pubs. On the internet. Locally known suppliers. Sometimes found on market stalls, and do on. On top of this is illegal drugs of all types. The list is endless.
Things are done about very serious cases with faulty, dangerous goods. But there's too much going on to track it all. So if no-one is really being hurt, that tends to get left. That way, local peace is kept. Sellers can feed themselves. Buyers understand they're not getting the real thing, but are happy with what they can afford.
Thanks Christopher, I believe if they are providing fake products than there must be a punishment for this fake. but if the product is not than what we can do as a policy maker.
It's a good question, and not easy to answer. Here in the UK, the long established legal rule is something called "caveat emptor" which means "buyer beware." So, if you buy a fake it's your fault. A lot of people buy them knowingly to get the style, at a fraction of the cost. If the product is actually dangerous, then that's a different matter. The seller has a duty of care towers you. But that's difficult to enforce in these cases.
One problem here is the cost of enforcement. Police have little time or money for catching small criminals. The big ones can afford good lawyers!
Dear colleagues. the informal is a world reality only it is in the underdeveloped countries that the phenomenon is more apparent and more important. in many of these countries it accounts for more than 50% of employment and GDP. In developed countries it is more the underground economy that is most studied (fraud and tax evasion and social .....)
Ah, Sabine, thank you! I'm not sure I've got it even now, but I'm thinking "correcting corrupt (alternative) market practices." Now this is really about protecting property rights in the widest sense: brands, trade marks, French terroirs (no more Canadian champagne 😥), and so on. Well the property owners are the identifiers mainly, but they need support from state enforcement. Or you might think it's not a real problem. No one really believes their £30.00 Rolex is genuine, and it might just stop them mugging me for my real one?
In some ways I dislike copyrights very much because they restrict access to generic drugs around the world. But, I also know they're expensive to develop and companies "deserve" a fair profit....
I don't mind trademarks if they're directly linked to a particular producer... it's important information.
I hate and despise "brands". Bloody cowboys. Produce nothing, but have your name stamped on it. Fashion for sad people....